Jump to site navigation menus


Go to UEL Home Page

School of Psychology

Psychology Staff

| Brief biography | Teaching | Research/Publications |

Dr Sharon Cahill

Sharon Cahill

Position: Senior Lecturer

Location: AE.1.32, Stratford

Telephone: +44 (0)20 8223 4574

Contact address:

School of Psychology
The University of East London
Stratford Campus
Water Lane
London
E15 4LZ

Brief biography:

Sharon Cahill studied undergraduate psychology at the University of Teesside (graduating in 1994) going onto study MSc in Health Psychology and Health Education at Edinburgh University (graduating in 1995). Her PhD was completed in 2002 (Glasgow Caledonian University) entitled “Women’s Experience(s) of Anger: Social and Personal Perceptions” using Q-methodology and a thematic discourse analysis.

As a postgraduate researcher Dr Cahill worked at the HRSD at the Institute of Psychiatry (Kings College London) for three years as a research fellow, managing two research projects focusing upon developments in service provision for mental health patients. Outcomes include: a valid and reliable mental health assessment tool - the Threshold Assessment Grid (the ‘TAG’), used for referral purposes across a range of mental health services; FOCUS randomized control trial, notable for its inclusion of the patient and practitioner as raters of mental wellbeing and also for feedback being given about both sets of assessment, with positive impacts on reduced admission rates. The Threshold and Focus studies are also notable for teaching practitioners how to use standardised assessments longitudinally which is not normal practice in mental health research or necessarily in everyday clinical practice.

Sharon has been teaching at different levels and with different types of students for over seventeen years. As a registered nurse she taught student nurses both theoretical and clinical skills. During her own time as an MSc and PhD student she taught undergraduate psychology students, medical students and health care professionals. These opportunities allowed her to develop differing styles of teaching (lectures, workshops, tutorials) according to the needs of the student. Part of her role as a researcher fellow/co-ordinator at the Institute of Psychiatry was to teach and train participants to use standardised assessments. The participants ranged from people with severe mental health problems to consultant psychiatrists. Attention to the participant’s level of understanding and ability was crucial in firstly developing a rapport to facilitate learning and secondly to ‘pitch’ the teaching at the correct level.

As Senior lecturer her main role has been to facilitate postgraduate students’ understanding of the complexities of qualitative inquiry. Her aim is to encourage, challenge and foster self-motivation in the student in order for them to develop the confidence to begin a qualitative piece of work. She has designed modules that offer the postgraduate student skills and experiences which launches them on their ‘adventure’ into qualitative research.

Return to top

Activities/responsible for:

  • PYM704: Applying Research Methods in Positive Psychology
  • Theme 4: Reseach Methods programmes for Educational Psychology
  • Doctorates above and
  • Qualitative Research Methods

Return to top

Areas of interest/Summary of Expertise:

  • Qualitative research methods
  • Emotion and gender
  • Women and the body (specifically body art)

Teaching:

Programmes:

  • Doctorate in Child and Applied Educational Psychology
  • Doctorate in Child and Educational Psychology
  • Doctorate in Occupational Psychology
  • Bsc Psychology

Return to top

Modules:

  • Theme 4: Reseach Methods programmes for Educational Psychology Doctorates above and
  • Qualitative Research Methods

Return to top

Research / Publications:

Current research:

Peer-reviewed Journal Articles
  1. Slade, M., Kuipers, E., Priebe, S., Thornicroft, G., Cahill, S., & Leese, M. (in press). The association between patient-rated unmet need a quality of life: baseline results from the FOCUS Study. British Journal of Psychiatry.
  2. Davis, B., & Cahill, S. (2006). Challenging expectations for every child through innovation, regeneration and reinvention. Educational and Child Psychology, 23(1), 80–89.
  3. Slade, M., McCrone, P., Kuipers, E., Leese, M., Cahill, S., Parabiaghi, A., et al. (2006). Use of standardised outcome measures in adult mental health services: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 189(4), 330–336. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.105.015412
  4. Riley, S., & Cahill, S. (2005). Managing meaning and belonging: negotiating authenticity with body art. Journal of Youth Studies, 8(3), 261–279. doi:10.1080/13676260500261843
  5. Slade, M., Leese, M., Cahill, S., Thornicroft, G., & Kuipers, E. (2005). Patient-rated mental health needs and quality of life improvement. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187(3), 256–261. doi:10.1192/bjp.187.3.256
  6. Riley, S., Schouton, W., & Cahill, S. (2003). Exploring the dynamics of subjectivity and power of the researcher and researched. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(2).
  7. Slade, M., Cahill, S., Kelsey, W., Powell, R., & Strathdee, G. (2002). Threshold 2: the reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG). Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 106(6), 453–460. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.02356.x
  8. Slade, M., Cahill, S., Kelsey, W., Leese, M., Powell, R., & Strathdee, G. (2001). Threshold 3: the feasibility of the Threshold Assessment Grid (TAG) for routine assessment of the severity of mental health problems. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 36(10), 516–521. doi:10.1007/s001270170017
Non-peer-reviewed Journal Articles
  1. Slade, M., Cahill, S., Kelsey, W., Leese, M., Powell, R., & Strathdee, G. (2003). Threshold 4: an evaluation of the Threshold Assessment Grid as an aid to mental health referrals. Primary Care Mental Health, 1, 45–54.
  2. Slade, M., Cahill, S., Kelsey, W., Powell, R., & Strathdee, G. (2001). Threshold Assessment Grid: a new approach to identifying severity of mental health problems. Actas Españolas de Psiquitría, 29(11), 33.
Reports
  1. Slade, M., Cahill, S., Knight, T., Powell, R., & Strathdee, G. (2002). Good practice guidelines for identifying the priority group for specialist mental health services. London: Threshold Program.

Return to top

Research archive:

Peer-reviewed Journal Articles
  1. Mulvery, A., Terenzio, M., Bond, M. A., Huygens, I., Hamerton, H. R., & Cahill, S. (2000). Stories of relative privilege: power and social change in feminist community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(6), 883–911. doi:10.1023/A:1005120001986
Book Chapters
  1. Cahill, S., & Riley, S. (2000). Resistances and reconcilliations: women and body art. In M. Banim & A. Guy (Eds.), Personal collections: women’s relationships with their clothes. London: Berg.
  2. Banim, M., Guy, A., Cahill, S., & Bainbridge, A. (1997). “I don’t know what I need to know.” A peer sexual health project by young disabled people. In P. Aggleton, P. Davies & G. Hart (Eds.), AIDS: activism and alliances. London: Taylor Francis.
Conference Proceedings
  1. Cahill, S., & Duncan, E. (1996). Women’s experience of anger: an exploration of personal and social perceptions. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Psychology of Women Section Conference.

Return to top

Other scholarly activities:

  • Member of the School of Psychology Research Degree Subcommittee
  • Graduate member of the British Psychological Society

Return to top

Abstracts:

Managing Meaning and Belonging: Young Women’s Negotiation of Authenticity in Body Art

Sarah C. E. Riley & Sharon Cahill

It is a common-sense ideology that appearance is vertically representative, in that the outer surface reflects the inner self. This paper explores the impact of this ideology on women’s understandings of their Body Art. Meaning and belonging were identified as central themes in accounts produced from two focus groups with young women in Glasgow, Scotland who had piercings and tattoos. Meaning was constructed through two alternative accounts. First, that Body Art is meaningful because it represents a particular and valued subjectivity (brave, independent, different). Second, that the current popularity in Body Art endangers the vertical representation of the first account, making Body Art meaningless. To claim a meaningful relationship with Body Art, our participants drew on discourses of subcultural knowledge, ‘Othering’, authenticity, and rights. These discourses show that authenticity continues to be an important account in youth cultures. Authenticity both worked to produce a meaningful personal identity, but also a ‘mythical mainstream’ that denied other young women discursive space from which to explore alternative subjectivities through Body Art.

Return to top

Last updated: 4 September 2009.


© 2010

Dr David Harper

Dave Harper, Psychology lecturer at UEL, is one of twelve scientists chosen as inspiring career case studies for a new report, “Critical Paths”. The report is being published by Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR), who selected Dave from a country-wide search across a range of scientific disciplines.

Read more about SGR’s ethical science showcase >>

Site Search:

Navigation menus:


INFORMATION FOR SCREENREADER USERS:

For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link:Link to general description

For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link:Link to accessibility information


The following message does not apply to screenreader users:

IF THIS TEXT APPEARS ON THE SCREEN YOU ARE ADVISED TO UPDATE YOUR WEB BROWSER

You will still be able to access all the essential content of this web site, but it will not look, or function, exactly as intended.

For further information follow this link. |

link to internal pages
|
The School of Psychology
|
Circuit