Position: Lecturer
Location: AE.2.34, Stratford
Telephone: +44 (0)20 8223 4305
Email: i.r.wells@uel.ac.uk
Contact address:
School of Psychology
The University of East London
Stratford Campus
Water Lane
London
E15 4LZ
Ian graduated from UEL with a first-class degree, having returned to education as a mature student. He remained at UEL to take up a teaching position and to conduct research for his PhD.
Ian leads the BSc level-1 module “Thinking Like a Psychologist” and the Research Methods module for the School’s MSc Psychology programme. “Thinking Like a Psychologist” draws on Ian’s PhD research in an attempt to equip new students with the generic thinking skills they will need to be successful in their studies. In addition, Ian teaches Cognitive Psychology to both level-1 and level-2 undergraduates.
Ian is a member of the school’s Learning and Teaching commitee and is the school’s representative on the university’s Turnitin Users Group.
Ian’s research focuses on linking educational practice to theory from cognitive psychology, with a particular interest in the facilitation and assessment of generic thinking skills. He also has broader interests in teaching and learning practice. This includes the development of multimedia animated tutorials to teach the use of SPSS (PASW) and, more generally, the introduction of blended learning in teaching practice.
The OCR AS level examination as a means of assessing the critical thinking skills of undergraduate students: a pilot study.
With the advent of benchmark statements (Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education [QAA], 2002), psychology undergraduate degree courses in the UK are now required both to develop and assess the critical thinking skills of their students. The study reported here takes a pragmatic view of problems associated with the lack of a consensual definition of critical thinking by adopting a measure that has been implicitly endorsed by the educational establishment in the UK. The multiple choice component of the Oxford, Cambridge and RSA (OCR) AS level critical thinking examination was completed by 176 students. The results showed that the measure had a high level of internal reliability and was consistently related to performance on traditional measures of academic achievement. It is suggested that the measure is reliable enough to be used in further research.
For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description
For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information