|
Final award |
PgCert |
|
Intermediate awards available |
N/A |
|
UCAS code |
N/A |
|
Details of professional body accreditation |
N/A |
|
Relevant QAA Benchmark statements |
Psychology |
|
Date specification last up-dated |
November 2005 |
The programme aims to provide an understanding of children’s communications and the therapeutic process, through knowledge and application of basic psychoanalytic concepts for those who have no formal training in psychoanalytic psychotherapy with children.
The programme aims to develop students’ understanding of psychoanalytic concepts to inform current workplace practice and enhance the quality of direct work with children. The programme is multidisciplinary and aimed at staff from social services, child and family consultation centres, special schools, residential units, family centres and similar organisations who work with children.
The programme integrates theory and practice to enhance the students’ understanding of the unconscious communications of children and their interactions with their child clients.
The most important entry requirement is that the student is currently in a work situation in which they are engaged in direct work with children. Whilst many are already professionally qualified and have a basic degree, we also accept those who may not have had standard higher educational backgrounds. For those who do not have a degree applicants may be admitted on the basis of relevant working experience, which demonstrates appropriate knowledge and skills. We apply the principle of equality of opportunity and encourage the recruitment of those with special needs.
The programme is part-time, one afternoon a week for one year.
Theory is taught through lectures by senior members of the Tavistock staff with special expertise. The whole student group attends (usually 20) and these are conducted in an interactive style, chaired by the Organising Tutor and involving discussion. The presence of the Organising Tutor maintains continuity of learning between lectures and initiates review and feedback throughout the year. Work discussion seminars are in small groups of 5 with a group leader, all Child and Adolescent Psychotherapists. These small seminars involve application of students’ own work from their current child case load.
Assessment is based on two written submissions during the programme of the year. The Theory essay is 3,000 words and is submitted in March. Students will draw on the lectures, their own reading and apply this theoretical knowledge of basic psychoanalytic concepts to their interactions with children. The Work Discussion essay is 4,000 words and is submitted in June. It provides an opportunity for students to reflect on their learning and experience of being with child clients in their own professional roles, which may constrain or promote the development of therapeutic relationships. The award is based on reaching a satisfactory standard in these submissions – ie 50%. Client confidentiality is protected by changing the names of individuals and institutions.
The programme offers the opportunity for each student to enhance and deepen their professional understanding of their work with children within their particular role and work setting. Students consider the boundaries of their professional role and they explore the possible conscious and unconscious meanings of the events and behaviour of children with whom they are interacting and communicating. They also consider possible dynamics at play within their work setting that may inhibit or promote therapeutic working practices with children and families.
There is no dissertation in this programme, but students are encouraged to take further their own ideas gained throughout the programme by considering extending their learning and continuing with other programmes if appropriate. Individual tutors encourage this thinking throughout their contact with the student.
This programme is not a professional training, but it enhances the skills and competencies of those involved in therapeutic work with children. The work place benefits from the added knowledge and skills brought back to it by staff who have participated.
While this is not a clinical training programme, it can be used as a way of entering a training escalator for those who feel comfortable using this framework of thinking. Routes to further study for those who have a social work training include going on to further programmes in Social Work; some Educational Psychologists do this programme as part of their Doctoral programme; further programmes for those involved in the discipline of nursing as the programme is ENB credited; those in an educational setting may go on to D1- Emotional factors in teaching and learning which now has a counselling component; and those who are interested in possibly doing a full professional training in psychoanalytic psychotherapy with children and adolescents are encouraged to begin the pre-clinical M7 Psychoanalytic Observational Studies programme. Completion of this can then be a gateway to full clinical training; Some are encouraged to take the equivalent programme D33 in work with adolescents. Others may be interested in pursuing the programme D42 for primary mental health workers or those interested in a systemic model may pursue training in family therapy.
An important part of the learning experience is that students meet with their individual tutors twice a term to reflect on the experience of the programme and their progress on it. Brief notes are kept by the tutor as an aide memoire to the learning and feedback process and in order to follow up on agreed action. The tutor will be expected to be aware of the student’s work context and to think about possibilities for future learning and further training or professional development opportunities. The Organising Tutor advises on study skill methods and essay writing. Students with special needs are individually monitored so that any extra input required in terms of academic support can be addressed. Seminar leaders create a climate in the small groups for careful reflection on the academic content and its individual application to the particular work settings of the students.
The Tavistock Clinic is an international centre of excellence for a psychoanalytic framework of understanding of therapeutic work with children. Students are exposed to lecturers who are leaders in their field of work with particular groups of children eg. those who are fostered and adopted or those with autistic spectrum disorders . The Tavistock Centre has an excellent library system, which all students are encouraged to make use of to the fullest extent possible. Students are exposed to clinicians and teachers of high calibre and meet a wide range of colleagues on the programme from a diversity of work settings from whose work they benefit enormously. Students take back to their places of work knowledge and understanding that they then share with others on their teams.
This programme is designed to give you the opportunity to:
Knowledge
Thinking skills
Subject-Based Practical skills
Skills for life and work (general skills)
All programmes are credit-rated to help you to understand the amount and level of study that is needed.
One credit is equal to 10 hours of directed study time (this includes everything you do e.g. lecture, seminar and private study).
Credits are assigned to one of 5 levels:
The overall credit-rating of this programme is 60 credit for PgCert.
This is a part-time programme - one afternoon a week for one year.
The teaching year is divided into three 10 week academic terms, starting in October and ending in July.
All teaching for this one year part-time programme takes place on a Monday afternoon. Lectures are from 1.45-3.00pm. There is a break for 45 minutes when students may go to the canteen for tea, coffee biscuits etc. During this time they can get to know one another, use the library or have an individual tutorial (two per term). From 3.45-5.00pm the Work Discussion Seminar takes place.
|
Year |
Unit title |
credit |
status |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Basic theoretical concepts – term 1 |
10 |
Core |
|
1 |
A Psychoanalytic understanding of Child Development – term 2 |
10 |
Core |
|
1 |
Understanding particular client groups – term 3 |
10 |
Core |
|
1 |
Work Discussion Seminars – detailed discussion of material brought from the students’ work settings – all three terms |
30 |
Core |
Where a student is eligible for an Masters award then the award classification is determined by calculating the arithmetic mean of all marks and applying the mark obtained as a percentage, with all decimals points rounded up to the nearest whole number, to the following classification
|
70% - 100% |
Distinction |
|
60% - 69% |
Merit |
|
50% - 59% |
Pass |
|
0% - 49% |
Not Passed |
Knowledge is developed through
Thinking skills are developed through
Practical skills are developed through
Skills for life and work (general skills) are developed through
List here the assessment methods that you use. Once again, in order to demonstrate that all learning outcomes are assessed, it might be helpful if you use one of the approaches suggested above e.g..
Knowledge is assessed by
Thinking skills are assessed by
Practical skills are assessed by
Skills for life and work (general skills) are assessed by
Before this programme started the University checked that:
This is done through a process of programme approval which involves convening a panel of academic experts including some subject specialists from other institutions. Each panel scrutinises available documents and talks to the staff who will teach the programme before deciding whether it can be approved
The quality of this programme is monitored each year through evaluating:
Drawing on this and other information an Annual Quality Improvement Plan is drawn up by the staff who teach the programme that is reviewed at departmental and faculty level.
Once every five years the University undertakes an in-depth review of the whole subject area. This is undertaken by a panel that includes at least three external subject specialists. The panel considers documents, looks at student work, speaks to current and former students and speaks to staff before drawing its conclusions. The result is a report highlighting good practice and identifying areas where action is needed.
This programme has a programme committee comprising all relevant teaching staff, student representatives and others who make a contribution towards the effective operation of the programme (e.g. library/technician staff). The committee is responsible for the quality of the programme. It oversees preparation of the Annual Quality Improvement Plan and proposes changes to improve quality. The programme/subject area committee plays a critical role in the University's quality assurance procedures.
The standard of this programme is monitored by at least one external examiner. External examiners have two primary responsibilities:
External examiners fulfil these responsibilities in a variety of ways including:
The following methods for gaining student feedback are used on this programme:
Students are notified of the action taken through:
The following methods are used for gaining the views of other interested parties:
| Location | Which elements? | Taught by UEL staff | Taught by local staff | Method of Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Further information about this programme is available from:
For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description
For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information