|
Final award |
Professional Doctorate |
|
Intermediate awards available |
N/A |
|
UCAS code |
N/A |
|
Details of professional body accreditation |
N/A |
|
Relevant QAA Benchmark statements |
N/A |
|
Date specification last up-dated |
September 2011 |
-
Students will have completed an AFT-accredited Masters programme in family therapy/systemic psychotherapy, or its equivalent.
At least two members of academic staff will review each application, have sight of the student's previous MSc research dissertation or its equivalent, and interview the applicant before a decision is made.
Applicants with either prior-certified learning or prior-experiential learning that closely matches the specified learning outcomes of the taught part of the programme may be able to claim exemption via agreed university procedures. No exemption can be claimed against the research part of the programme or in situations where a professional body excludes it.
Where English is not the applicant’s first language, a minimum IELTS Academic English, or such qualifications as our University deems comparable, score of 7.0 overall, with a minimum of 6.5 in all components, is required at entry. Such assessment of English language competence must normally have been undertaken no more than two years prior to application, though relevant and more recent study in a United Kingdom Higher Education Institution may be accepted as sufficient proof of ability.
In the first year, students prepare a research proposal. In addition, they complete a critique of previous research they have conducted. Students are supported during this year with a combination of fortnightly research methods seminars, an invited speakers programme, end of term research presentations of ongoing student work, and meetings with designated research supervisors.
In the second year, and following approval of the research thesis proposal, students begin their research work, supported by a similar teaching and supervision programme. Formal assignments include two Working Papers and an Essay.
From the third year onwards, students complete and write up their research thesis, with the help of research tutorials with their supervisors.
On average, students complete the entire course in four to five years.
The course emphasises and develops research presentation skills at the biannual research symposia.
The course relies on a combination of peer learning in groups, with lectures, workshop–style presentations, student symposia, and large group discussions with outside presenters, in an adult learning environment, to support and develop research competence in systemic family therapists.
Research seminars provide an opportunity for the group to discuss or debate a topic following a presentation by a tutor or by one or more students. Seminars encourage a free flow of ideas and thoughts, providing a stimulating learning environment. Students then meet in their small programme group to apply these ideas to their own research area.
There are also regular whole-trust research events and a yearly Research Week tailored to the needs of doctoral research students.
Students receive individual research supervision sessions. These enable students to discuss their work and related issues, and receive feedback on how they are progressing. All research students have a Director of Studies and their secondary supervisor(s) will be chosen to complement the knowledge and skills of the Director of Studies in accord with the Trust-UEL Research Degrees Regulations.
The programme is lively, highly participative and interactive, encouraging students to challenge ideas, views and beliefs. The course staff believe that this approach provides the most effective form of teaching and learning at this level.
Students have the use of a well-stocked library at the Tavistock Centre, with relevant academic and clinical research journals, research texts, electronic access and electronic databases, as well as access to the UEL library.
There are fives units which are assessed prior to the submission of the thesis.
The final award is made on the basis of the submitted research thesis which is examined by an external and internal examiner at a viva voce oral examination.
The substantive research study and thesis make a contribution both to the practice and theory of systemic psychotherapy and to the personal and professional development of the practitioner.
-Registration of the research component can only take place following a recommendation from the relevant School Research Degrees Sub-Committee to the university Research Degrees Subcommittee of the suitability of the candidate to undertake research, of the programme of research, of the supervision arrangements and of the research environment. These approvals require appropriate academic judgement to be brought to bear on the viability of each research proposal.
Candidates for a Professional Doctorate must successfully complete all assessed elements from the taught part of their programme before award of the degree can be made.
Once the research stage of the programme is reached progression will be formally reviewed annually by a Panel comprised of staff with appropriate academic and professional expertise who are independent of the candidate’s supervisory team. The School Research Degrees Sub-Committee and the university Research Degrees Subcommittee monitor the reports from these Panels.
The examination of the research component of the Professional Doctorate has two stages: firstly the submission and preliminary assessment of the research; and secondly its defence by oral examination.
-
Graduates from the Doctoral programme have gone on to publish their work in peer reviewed journals, and to carry out further research. Their Doctoral qualification has enabled them to apply for more senior positions.
We pay close attention to the allocation of supervisors and the Director of Studies for each student, to obtain a good fit with knowledge of the research topic and/or research methods. Professional Doctorate students will have at least two and not normally more than three supervisors, who together demonstrate an appropriate range of academic and professional experience. One supervisor shall be the Director of Studies with responsibility to supervise the candidate on a regular and frequent basis.
Peer learning and support is actively encouraged and recognised as an important aspect of the learning experience. Research seminars are tailored in part to the needs and interests of each learning group. Staff are themselves research active and the doctorate is linked to the Family Therapy and Systemic Research Centre providing a collaborative and up-to-date context for research activity.
We have a programme of invited speakers, who are asked to discuss methodological and ethical problems in their research work and their attempted solutions. This, combined with our end of term student presentation programme, gives first hand experience of how other researchers tackle similar dilemmas.
This programme is designed to give you the opportunity to:
A candidate who is awarded a Professional Doctorate will be expected to have achieved the following learning outcomes:
Knowledge
Thinking skills.
Subject-based practical skills
Skills for life and work (general skills)
All programmes are credit-rated to help you to understand the amount and level of study that is needed.
One credit is equal to 10 hours of directed study time (this includes everything you do e.g. lecture seminar and private study).
Credits are assigned to one of 5 levels:
0 equivalent in standard to GCE 'A' level and is intended to prepare students for year one of an undergraduate degree programme
1 equivalent in standard to the first year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
2 equivalent in standard to the second year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
3 equivalent in standard to the third year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
M equivalent in standard to a Masters degree
D equivalent in standard to a Doctorate degree
The overall credit rating for the Professional Doctorate in Systemic Psychotherapy is 540 at D level.
The taught part of the course comprises 2 years. Students typically complete the entire course (to submission of the research thesis) in four to five years. The maximum period of enrolment on the course is 8 years.
The normal minimum and maximum periods of research registration (from approval of the research thesis) for a Professional Doctorate are as follows:
| Minimum | Maximum | |
| Part-time | 30 months | 60 months |
The programme is divided into academic years, beginning in October and ending in July.
The teaching programme for the first year runs termly (3 terms), once a fortnight on Thursdays.
The first year involves:
The second year of the programme involves students starting to plan and carry out their own research project. They will seek ethical approval for their research project from the relevant body.
Teaching continues, in small groups, fortnightly, during the second year.
Students complete three assignments:
The research years of the Doctoral programme are based around individual research supervision meetings with termly Data Analysis Workshops, twice-yearly Research Symposia and twice yearly Invited Speaker sessions.
Research supervision is offered throughout the research phase of the course.
All units must be completed and passed to gain the award of Professional Doctorate.
|
Year |
Level |
UEL Unit |
Unit Title |
Credit |
Status |
|
1 |
D |
M10:1 |
Research Critique |
20 |
Core |
|
1 |
D |
M10:2 |
Designing a research proposal |
60 |
Core |
|
2 |
D |
M10:3 |
Professional Development 1: Clinical Links to Research |
20 |
Core |
|
2 |
D |
M10:4 |
Professional Development 2: Research Presentation: Qualitative Data Analysis |
20 |
Core |
|
2 |
D |
M10:5 |
Theoretical positions |
40 |
Core |
|
3+ |
D |
n/a |
Thesis |
380 |
Core |
In order to gain a Professional Doctorate you will need to achieve 540 credits. To pass an assignment students must achieve a mark of at least 60%
Knowledge, thinking skills, practical skills and skills for life and work are all developed in the research seminars, (both within course and across doctoral courses), in small group and larger group discussions, through individual research supervision, through invited speaker presentations, through presenting their own research at various stages, through data analysis sessions, through the doctoral symposia, attending research conferences, in completing the written assessments, in carrying out their substantive research study, and in writing the doctoral thesis and defending it in the viva voce / oral examination.
Knowledge is developed through:
Thinking skills are developed through:
Subject-Based Practical skills are developed through:
Skills for life and work (general skills) are developed through:
The main assessment method on the programme is through the written assignments: The Research Critique, The Research Proposal, The Professional Development Paper 1, The Professional Development Research Presentation, The Theoretical Essay, The Doctoral Thesis.
However throughout the programme there is considerable emphasis placed on and the giving of ongoing feedback to doctoral students about their contributions, the development of their research designs and choice of methods, their research presentations, their data analysis, both within the research seminars and within supervision.
Knowledge is assessed by:
Thinking skills are assessed by:
Practical skills are assessed by:
Skills for life and work (general skills) are assessed by:
Before this programme started, the following was checked:
This is done through a process of programme approval which involves consulting academic experts including some subject specialists from other institutions.
The quality of this programme is monitored each year through evaluating:
Drawing on this and other information, programme teams undertake the annual Review and Enhancement Process which is co-ordinated at School level and includes student participation. The process is monitored by the Quality and Standards Committee.
Once every six years an in-depth review of the whole field is undertaken by a panel that includes at least two external subject specialists. The panel considers documents, looks at student work, speaks to current and former students and speaks to staff before drawing its conclusions. The result is a report highlighting good practice and identifying areas where action is needed.
This programme has a programme committee comprising all relevant teaching staff, student representatives and others who make a contribution towards the effective operation of the programme (e.g. library/technician staff). The committee has responsibilities for the quality of the programme. It provides input into the operation of the Review and Enhancement Process and proposes changes to improve quality. The programme committee plays a critical role in the quality assurance procedures.
The standard of this programme is monitored by at least one external examiner. External examiners have two primary responsibilities:
External examiners fulfil these responsibilities in a variety of ways including:
Providing feedback through an annual report that enables us to make improvements for the future.
The following methods for gaining student feedback are used on this programme:
Students are notified of the action taken through:
The following methods are used for gaining the views of other interested parties:
| Location | Which elements? | Taught by UEL staff | Taught by local staff | Method of Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Further information about this programme is available from:
For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description
For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information