University of East London Homepage


Programme Specification for Systemic Psychotherapy Professional Doctorate

This programme is only offered at: The Tavistock & Portman NHS Foundation Trust.

Final award

Professional Doctorate

Intermediate awards available

N/A

UCAS code

N/A

Details of professional body accreditation

N/A

Relevant QAA Benchmark statements

N/A

Date specification last up-dated

September 2011

Profile

The summary - programme advertising leaflet

Programme content

This doctorate programme enables qualified Systemic Psychotherapists to carry out in-depth research, and through the completion of a substantial research thesis, to make a contribution to the field of systemic psychotherapy.

Students are encouraged to find a research focus arising out of their own practice. They are taught research methods, with an emphasis on qualitative and mixed methods approaches that fit with critical and social constructionist approaches in systemic psychotherapy practice.

The experience of carrying out research alongside other practitioner-researchers and of studying within a small and lively research community is an invaluable one.

Tutors and supervisors are themselves senior systemic clinicians and researchers with different backgrounds and are engaged in contemporary clinical and research projects and debates.

Doctoral students are from a diverse range of cultures and backgrounds and the programme provides many opportunities and contexts for interchange and debate with systemic peers, other professional doctorate students, and senior staff.

Systemic Psychotherapy at UEL

-

Admission requirements

Students will have completed an AFT-accredited Masters programme in family therapy/systemic psychotherapy, or its equivalent.

At least two members of academic staff will review each application, have sight of the student's previous MSc research dissertation or its equivalent, and interview the applicant before a decision is made.

Applicants with either prior-certified learning or prior-experiential learning that closely matches the specified learning outcomes of the taught part of the programme may be able to claim exemption via agreed university procedures. No exemption can be claimed against the research part of the programme or in situations where a professional body excludes it.

Where English is not the applicant’s first language, a minimum IELTS Academic English, or such qualifications as our University deems comparable, score of 7.0 overall, with a minimum of 6.5 in all components, is required at entry. Such assessment of English language competence must normally have been undertaken no more than two years prior to application, though relevant and more recent study in a United Kingdom Higher Education Institution may be accepted as sufficient proof of ability.

Programme structure

In the first year, students prepare a research proposal. In addition, they complete a critique of previous research they have conducted. Students are supported during this year with a combination of fortnightly research methods seminars, an invited speakers programme, end of term research presentations of ongoing student work, and meetings with designated research supervisors.

In the second year, and following approval of the research thesis proposal, students begin their research work, supported by a similar teaching and supervision programme. Formal assignments include two Working Papers and an Essay.

From the third year onwards, students complete and write up their research thesis, with the help of research tutorials with their supervisors.

On average, students complete the entire course in four to five years.

The course  emphasises and develops research presentation skills at the biannual research symposia.

Learning environment

The course relies on a combination of peer learning in groups, with lectures, workshop–style presentations, student symposia, and large group discussions with outside presenters, in an adult learning environment, to support and develop research competence in systemic family therapists.

Research seminars provide an opportunity for the group to discuss or debate a topic following a presentation by a tutor or by one or more students. Seminars encourage a free flow of ideas and thoughts, providing a stimulating learning environment. Students then meet in their small programme group to apply these ideas to their own research area.

There are also regular whole-trust research events and a yearly Research Week tailored to the needs of doctoral research students.

Students receive individual research supervision sessions. These enable students to discuss their work and related issues, and receive feedback on how they are progressing. All research students have a Director of Studies and their secondary supervisor(s) will be chosen to complement the knowledge and skills of the Director of Studies in accord with the Trust-UEL Research Degrees Regulations.

The programme is lively, highly participative and interactive, encouraging students to challenge ideas, views and beliefs. The course staff believe that this approach provides the most effective form of teaching and learning at this level.

Students have the use of a well-stocked library at the Tavistock Centre, with relevant academic and clinical research journals, research texts, electronic access and electronic databases, as well as access to the UEL library.

Assessment

There are fives units which are assessed prior to the submission of the thesis.

The final award is made on the basis of the submitted research thesis which is examined by an external and internal examiner at a viva voce oral examination.

Relevance to work/profession

The substantive research study and thesis make a contribution both to the practice and theory of systemic psychotherapy and to the personal and professional development of the practitioner.

Research/project work

-Registration of the research component can only take place following a recommendation from the relevant School Research Degrees Sub-Committee to the university Research Degrees Subcommittee of the suitability of the candidate to undertake research, of the programme of research, of the supervision arrangements and of the research environment. These approvals require appropriate academic judgement to be brought to bear on the viability of each research proposal.

Candidates for a Professional Doctorate must successfully complete all assessed elements from the taught part of their programme before award of the degree can be made.

Once the research stage of the programme is reached progression will be formally reviewed annually by a Panel comprised of staff with appropriate academic and professional expertise who are independent of the candidate’s supervisory team. The School Research Degrees Sub-Committee and the university Research Degrees Subcommittee monitor the reports from these Panels.

The examination of the research component of the Professional Doctorate has two stages: firstly the submission and preliminary assessment of the research; and secondly its defence by oral examination.

Added value

-

Your future career

Graduates from the Doctoral programme have gone on to publish their work in peer reviewed journals, and to carry out further research. Their Doctoral qualification has enabled them to apply for more senior positions.

How we support you

We pay close attention to the allocation of supervisors and the Director of Studies for each student, to obtain a good fit with knowledge of the research topic and/or research methods. Professional Doctorate students will have at least two and not normally more than three supervisors, who together demonstrate an appropriate range of academic and professional experience. One supervisor shall be the Director of Studies with responsibility to supervise the candidate on a regular and frequent basis.

Peer learning and support is actively encouraged and recognised as an important aspect of the learning experience. Research seminars are tailored in part to the needs and interests of each learning group. Staff are themselves research active and the doctorate is linked to the Family Therapy and Systemic Research Centre providing a collaborative and up-to-date context for research activity.

Bonus factors

We have a programme of invited speakers, who are asked to discuss methodological and ethical problems in their research work and their attempted solutions. This, combined with our end of term student presentation programme, gives first hand experience of how other researchers tackle similar dilemmas.

Outcomes

Programme aims and learning outcomes

What is this programme designed to achieve?

This programme is designed to give you the opportunity to:

  • continue their professional and academic development by carrying out in-depth research connected to their clinical interests
  • make an original contribution to knowledge in the field with a research thesis

What will you learn?

A candidate who is awarded a Professional Doctorate will be expected to have achieved the following learning outcomes:

Knowledge

  • Generated extensive knowledge in the area of research. Systematically acquired an understanding of a substantial body of knowledge which is at the forefront of the systemic psychotherapy discipline or an area of systemic practice;
  • Created and interpreted new knowledge, through original research, of a quality to satisfy peer review, which extends the forefront of the discipline and merits publication;
  • Acquired knowledge of research methods that fit with systemic practice

Thinking skills.

  • An ability to offer a conceptual and critical analysis of existing research and thinking
  • An ability to offer a conceptual and critical analysis of clinical practice and theory
  • An ability to examine the underlying assumptions and theoretical underpinnings of their research work, and to maintain self‑reflexivity throughout their study        
  • An ability to consider the ethical issues of consent, confidentiality and anonymity
  • An ability to conceptualise, design and implement a project for the generation of new knowledge, application or understanding at the forefront of the discipline and to adjust the project design in the light of unforeseen problems;
  • A detailed understanding of applicable techniques for research and advanced academic enquiry;
  • An ability to present clearly and defend their research study, as well as showing an awareness of its limitations.

Subject-based practical skills

  • Ability to continue to undertake pure and/or applied research and development at an advanced level, contributing substantially to the development of new techniques, ideas or approaches;
  • An ability to apply doctoral level research skills, including research design skills
  • An ability to analyse qualitative data for systemic clinical and research purposes
  • An ability to make use of the implications and applications of their research for the systemic field.
  • Skills in service evaluation and design as senior systemic psychotherapist
  • Skills of critical analysis for systemic thinking and practice
  • Research leadership in the systemic psychotherapy field

Skills for life and work (general skills)

  • An ability to make informed judgments on complex and specialist issues, often in the absence of complete data, and to be able to communicate their ideas and conclusions clearly and effectively to specialist and non-specialist audiences:
  • A further development of qualities and transferable skills requiring the exercise of personal responsibility and largely autonomous initiative in complex and unpredictable situations, in professional or equivalent environments.
  • Doctoral level writing skills
  • An ability to carry out independent and focused study alongside the intensive demands of employment as senior practitioners

Structure

The programme structure

Introduction

All programmes are credit-rated to help you to understand the amount and level of study that is needed.
One credit is equal to 10 hours of directed study time (this includes everything you do e.g. lecture seminar and private study).
Credits are assigned to one of 5 levels:

0          equivalent in standard to GCE 'A' level and is intended to prepare students for year one of an undergraduate degree programme
1          equivalent in standard to the first year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
2          equivalent in standard to the second year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
3          equivalent in standard to the third year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
M         equivalent in standard to a Masters degree
D         equivalent in standard to a Doctorate degree

Credit rating

The overall credit rating for the Professional Doctorate in Systemic Psychotherapy is 540 at D level.

Typical duration

The taught part of the course comprises 2 years. Students typically complete the entire course (to submission of the research thesis) in four to five years. The maximum period of enrolment on the course is 8 years.

The normal minimum and maximum periods of research registration (from approval of the research thesis) for a Professional Doctorate are as follows:

  Minimum Maximum
Part-time 30 months 60 months

How the teaching year is divided

The programme is divided into academic years, beginning in October and ending in July.

The teaching programme for the first year runs termly (3 terms), once a fortnight on Thursdays.
The first year involves:

  • Reading for fortnightly seminars on research methods
  • Writing a Critique of previous research (3500 - 4000 words) and
  • Preparation of the Research Proposal (4000 words)

The second year of the programme involves students starting to plan and carry out their own research project. They will seek ethical approval for their research project from the relevant body.
Teaching continues, in small groups, fortnightly, during the second year.
Students complete three assignments:

  • Working Paper: Consider the inter-relationship between aspects of your clinical activity and the research question which you have chosen to explore (1500 words)
  • Research Presentation: Discuss the ways in which one approach to qualitative data analysis can generate knowledge relevant to clinical and professional practice
  • Theoretical Positions Essay (3500 - 4000 words)

The research years of the Doctoral programme are based around individual research supervision meetings with termly Data Analysis Workshops, twice-yearly Research Symposia and twice yearly Invited Speaker sessions. 

Research supervision is offered throughout the research phase of the course.

What you will study when

All units must be completed and passed to gain the award of Professional Doctorate.

Year

Level

UEL Unit
Code

Unit Title

Credit

Status

1

D

M10:1

Research Critique

20

Core

1

D

M10:2

Designing a research proposal

60

Core

2

D

M10:3

Professional Development 1: Clinical Links to Research

20

Core

2

D

M10:4

Professional Development 2: Research Presentation: Qualitative Data Analysis
and the Development of Clinical & Professional Practice

20

Core

2

D

M10:5

Theoretical positions

40

Core

3+

D

n/a

Thesis

380

Core

Requirements for gaining an award

In order to gain a Professional Doctorate you will need to achieve 540 credits. To pass an assignment students must achieve a mark of at least 60%

Assessment

Teaching, learning and assessment

Teaching and learning

Knowledge, thinking skills, practical skills and skills for life and work are all developed in the research seminars, (both within course and across doctoral courses), in small group and larger group discussions, through individual research supervision, through invited speaker presentations, through presenting their own research at various stages, through data analysis sessions, through the doctoral symposia, attending research conferences, in completing the written assessments, in carrying out their substantive research study, and in writing the doctoral thesis and defending it in the viva voce / oral examination.

Knowledge is developed through:

  • Seminars to develop students’ exploration of their area of systemic psychotherapy or Practice.
  • Seminars to develop students’ knowledge of research methods which fit with systemic practice and acquire an understanding of the applicable techniques for research and academic enquiry.
  • Symposia at which students present their own research at different stages, and learn from each other’s research presentations.
  • Invited speaker events where researchers present ways in which they have used research methodologies and the ethical issues involved.
  • Individual supervision in which the student is able to present their growing knowledge and dilemmas.
  • Through reviewing the literature in the area of the student’s own research.
  • Through carrying out the research study in which new knowledge will be created and interpreted, and then presented to others.

Thinking skills are developed through:

  • Seminars in which debate and interchange between multiple perspectives enable a conceptual and critical analysis of existing research, and of clinical practice and theory, to be developed.
  • Research seminars and hands on workshops to develop the ability to conceptualise, design and implement the research project.
  • Individual supervision encourages the maintenance of self-reflexivity throughout the research process.
  • The writing of a research diary develops critical and self-reflexive positions.
  • The analysis of the data and the discussion of its implications and applicability promote an ability to take the thinking to a different level.

 Subject-Based Practical skills are developed through:

  • Designing and carrying out the research project with the help of the research seminars, research presentations and individual supervision enables students to develop doctoral level research skills.
  • Data analysis sessions enable the students to develop their ability to analyse qualitative data and take part in giving feedback to their peers’ analysis. This also enables a self-reflexive position to be maintained as assumptions and absences are noted.      
  • Presentations of their research thinking and its progress throughout the programme develop presentation skills, clarity of thinking and an ability to use their audience’s feedback to further develop their research.
  • Writing the doctoral thesis enables students to draw out the implications for the systemic psychotherapy field.

Skills for life and work (general skills) are developed through:

  • Seminars in which service evaluation and design skills for senior family therapists are acquired.
  • Seminars, data analysis sessions, and symposia to enable the development of the skills of critical analysis for systemic thinking and practice
  • Carrying out doctoral level research within a research community develops the ability to offer research leadership in the systemic psychotherapy field
  • The writing of the Doctoral thesis hones writing skills at doctoral level
  • Independent and focused study alongside the intensive demands of employment as senior practitioners: To complete the doctoral research and thesis requires considerable focus and application as all our doctoral students hold down very demanding jobs.

Assessment

The main assessment method on the programme is through the written assignments:  The Research Critique, The Research Proposal, The Professional Development Paper 1, The Professional Development Research Presentation, The Theoretical Essay, The Doctoral Thesis.

However throughout the programme there is considerable emphasis placed on and the giving of ongoing feedback to doctoral students about their contributions, the development of their research designs and choice of methods, their research presentations, their data analysis, both within the research seminars and within supervision.

Knowledge is assessed by:

  • All the written assignments, and the research presentation, in relation to the theories and research which are referenced.

Thinking skills are assessed by:

  • the ability to critique, particularly through the Research Critique, and the theory essay, as well as the doctoral thesis and the viva voce.
  • the clarity and design of the research proposal
  • the ability to identify the student’s assumptions and how they take these into account in the research process, in the research critique paper, the research proposal, the professional development paper, the research presentation, the theoretical essay and the doctoral thesis.
  • the originality of thought evidenced in the doctoral thesis

Practical skills are assessed by:

  • The ability to carry out an analysis of data in the research presentation
  • The ability to carry out the research as evidenced in research presentations and in the doctoral thesis

 Skills for life and work (general skills) are assessed by:

  • The completion of the research and the writing of the doctoral thesis.
  • The defending of the thesis in the viva voce.

Quality

How we assure the quality of this programme

Before this programme started

Before this programme started, the following was checked:

  • there would be enough qualified staff to teach the programme;
  • adequate resources would be in place;
  • the overall aims and objectives were appropriate;
  • the content of the programme met national benchmark requirements;
  • the programme met any professional/statutory body requirements;
  • the proposal met other internal quality criteria covering a range of issues such as admissions policy, teaching, learning and assessment strategy and student support mechanisms.

This is done through a process of programme approval which involves consulting academic experts including some subject specialists from other institutions.

How we monitor the quality of this programme

The quality of this programme is monitored each year through evaluating:

  • external examiner reports (considering quality and standards);
  • statistical information (considering issues such as the pass rate);
  • student feedback.

Drawing on this and other information, programme teams undertake the annual Review and Enhancement Process which is co-ordinated at School level and includes student participation. The process is monitored by the Quality and Standards Committee.

Once every six years an in-depth review of the whole field is undertaken by a panel that includes at least two external subject specialists. The panel considers documents, looks at student work, speaks to current and former students and speaks to staff before drawing its conclusions. The result is a report highlighting good practice and identifying areas where action is needed.

The role of the programme committee

This programme has a programme committee comprising all relevant teaching staff, student representatives and others who make a contribution towards the effective operation of the programme (e.g. library/technician staff). The committee has responsibilities for the quality of the programme. It provides input into the operation of the Review and Enhancement Process and proposes changes to improve quality. The programme committee plays a critical role in the quality assurance procedures.

The role of external examiners

The standard of this programme is monitored by at least one external examiner. External examiners have two primary responsibilities:

  • To ensure the standard of the programme;
  • To ensure that justice is done to individual students.

External examiners fulfil these responsibilities in a variety of ways including:

  • Approving exam papers/assignments;
  • Attending assessment boards;
  • Reviewing samples of student work and moderating marks;
  • Ensuring that regulations are followed;

Providing feedback through an annual report that enables us to make improvements for the future.

Listening to the views of students

The following methods for gaining student feedback are used on this programme:

  • twice yearly Course Committee Meeting of students, staff and supervisors;
  • personal communication to tutors and supervisors; and
  • regular reviews in seminars.

Students are notified of the action taken through:

  • circulating the minutes of the course committee; and
  • communication with personal tutors.

Listening to the views of others

The following methods are used for gaining the views of other interested parties:

  • staff and candidates of other Tavistock Doctoral Programmes are invited to student presentations and provide comment; and
  • discussion with the External Examiners.

Further Information

Alternative locations for studying this programme

LocationWhich elements?Taught by UEL staffTaught by local staffMethod of Delivery

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Where you can find further information

Further information about this programme is available from:


Information for screenreader users:

For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description

For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information