University of East London Homepage


Programme Specification for Social Work Professional Doctorate

This course is only offered at the Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust but is now no longer recruiting

Final award

Professional Doctorate

Intermediate awards available

M Phil

UCAS code

N/A

Details of professional body accreditation

N/A

Relevant QAA Benchmark statements

Social Policy & Administration & Social Work

Date specification last up-dated

September 2003

Profile

The summary - programme advertising leaflet

Programme content

-

Professional Doctorate in Social Work at UEL/the Tavistock

The course provides opportunities for social work professionals to study beyond the Advanced Award. The academic standard of the Professional Doctorate is equivalent to a conventional PhD, but it enables advanced and intensive learning and research to be rooted in professional practice. Thus it contributes to the professional development of the individual and the wider professional community. Students on the programme will undertake three years practice in two of three settings (clinical practice, management/consultation and education/training), study theory, observation, policy and research methods and write an original thesis on an area of professional practice.

Admission requirements

Minimum entry requirements are:

  • At least 4 years post qualifying experience in social work
  • An MA in Social Work or Applied Social Studies or equivalent or an Advanced Award in Social Work
  • Evidence of ability to work at doctoral level
  • Evidence of a commitment to learning from experience, and deploying psychoanalytic and/or systemic concepts for professional understandin

Programme structure

Part 1, usually taken over three years part time study, one day a week. Consists of a number of taught elements and a programme of supervised professional practice. Students take a ‘major’ pathway over two years and a ’minor’ for one from clinical practice, management, education.

Part 2 consists of supervised work towards a thesis of 40-45000 words. The normal period of registration and study for Part 2 is 2 years.

Learning environment

Theory, observation, policy and research methods are taught in small seminar groups. Clinical supervision, tutorials and research supervision take place on a 1-1 basis.

Assessment

In Part 1 there are the following assessed elements

  • Indicative assessment, Year 1, theory essay (2500 words), observation essay (3000 words)
  • Infant Observation: Year 2, one 5000 word essay
  • Institutional Observation: Year 2, one 3000 word essay
  • Theory essay: Year 2 one 5000 word essay
  • Professional Practice essay: Year 3, one 8000-10000 word essay
  • Policy process Case study: Year 3, one 5000 word essay
  • Research Methods paper/Research project proposal: Year 3 one 5000 word essay
  • For those not wishing to proceed to Part 2 a synthesising poiece of work is required leading to the award of the M Phil

In Part 2, a thesis of 40000-45000 words

Relevance to work/profession

The Professional Doctorate in Social Work is a unique programme of study in that it is equivalent to a conventional Ph D but offers opportunities to develop professional practice to a very high standard. It thus integrates practice, policy and research and contributes to the development of the individual and the professional social work community. The doctorate thus aims to contribute to the consolidation and recovery of professional identity. Students will develop capacities for leadership and development of potential of colleagues and services.

Thesis/Dissertation/project work

Throughout Part 1 and Part 2 of the programme students have opportunities to develop and discuss their ideas and experiences in small seminar groups and individual tutorials/supervisions. All the assignments provide opportunities for making creative contributions to understanding practice based on experience. In Part 2 students research an area of professional practice relevant to their own interests leading to the writing of an original thesis.

Added value

This is one of very few professional doctorates in the UK. It is unique in that it provides a practice based programme, emphasising learning from experience, leading to a doctorate

Your future career

The course provides opportunities to develop specialist skills and leadership capacities. It is expected that the course will considerably enhance the career pathways for students within social work.

How we support you

Support is offered through the individualised learning programme, one to one relationships with tutors and supervisors and learning in a small group setting.

Bonus factors

As an international centre of excellence for psychoanalytic thinking, the Tavistock Centre has an excellent library system available both on the web and at the institution itself, for which students receive usage induction. The course gives an opportunity for students to meet both a wide range of experienced psychoanalytic practitioners and academics, and to experience a student body from a diversity of social work settings sharing common professional interests and values.

Because of its status, the professional doctorate forms a significant community within the Tavistock. There are regular research meetings and study days, featuring original work generated within the course, the Tavistock and other institutions in the UK and Europe.

All students undertake at least one year supervised clinical practice and this can often take place in one of the Departments of the Tavistock Clinic (Child and Family, Adolescent, Adult)

Outcomes

Programme aims and learning outcomes

What is this programme designed to achieve?

This programme is designed to give you the opportunity to:

(a) provide opportunities for integrated professional and academic study and development above the level offered by the CCETSW Advanced Award, by offering senior social work professionals the chance to undertake individualised programmes of study within a common academic and professional framework and a structured learning environment.

(b) enable social work professionals and teachers to pursue advanced study based in clinical, practice or applied management and educational experience and theorisation

(c) provide opportunities for trainees to achieve high standards of applied psychotherapeutic competence in social work contexts without attaining a formal qualification in psychotherapy, and to develop sophistication in the exercise of critical reflexivity with respect to their practice

(d) enable students to further the development of theory and applied research within the profession, by deepening and extending their own research skills and theoretical sophistication

(e) provide opportunities for senior and experienced social workers to develop advanced skills in professional leadership in clinical, educational, and managerial settings in modern NHS, social care and educational contexts.

(f) be fully and continually responsive to the needs of professionals as defined by their employers and themselves.

(f) develop a sophisticated understanding of the individual and social dynamics of power, exclusion, marginalisation and change processes in practice, management, therapeutic, group and organisational contexts.

(g) enhance the capacity to manage change, adapt creatively to rapidly changing policy environments, and develop the advanced competences necessary to respond professionally within reconfigured modes of service delivery.

What will you learn?

Knowledge

  • an in depth advanced understanding of the theoretical, methodological and research literature relevant to psychotherapeutic social work and be able to relate this creatively to students’ own specialised areas of practice
  • an advanced understanding of the nature of processes which can inform interventions and change processes
  • an advanced understanding of the dynamics of marginalisation, exclusion, power, and difference in professional practice and policy

Thinking skills

  • an advanced awareness of therapeutic process and the ability to apply this to practice, organisational processes and social policy
  • the capacity to make connections between observations, relevant theoretical constructs and practice interventions
  • the capacities to develop and think through an individual research project

Subject-Based Practical skills

  • capacities for leadership in the student’s areas of expertise
  • capacities for influencing the development of colleagues and services
  • skills in developing and implementing a programme of research
  • advanced practice skills in two of three domains (practice, management, education)

Skills for life and work (general skills)

  • Helps students to make links across subject areas, paradigms and theoretical orientations, which is a transferable skill.
  • Enhances ability and confidence to discuss ideas in a group setting
  • Enriches the students’ capacity to tolerate, in a course of considerable personal intensity, the emotional experiences of learning and working in social work

Structure

The programme structure

Introduction

All programmes are credit-rated to help you to understand the amount and level of study that is needed.

One credit is equal to 10 hours of directed study time (this includes everything you do e.g. lecture, seminar and private study).

Credits are assigned to one of 5 levels:

  • 0 - equivalent in standard to GCE 'A' level and is intended to prepare students for year one of an undergraduate degree programme
  • 1 - equivalent in standard to the first year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
  • 2 - equivalent in standard to the second year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
  • 3 - equivalent in standard to the third year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
  • M - equivalent in standard to a Masters degree

Credit rating

  1. The overall credit-rating of the Post Graduate Certifiate is 60 Level M credits
  2. The overall credit-rating of the Post grad DipCG (QCG) programme is 120 Level M credits
  3. The overall credit-rating of the MA Careers programme is 180 Level M credits

Typical duration

The course involves study in seminars for three years (Part 1) one morning a week – Tuesday. Additionally, time is needed for tutorials, practice supervision, observation (in the first two years) and reading. In Part 2 research seminars take place once a fortnight. Additionally there are individual meetings with research supervisors and time needed for individual study and research.

How the teaching year is divided

There are three 10-week academic terms, the first starting in October, and the third finishing in July. In addition we offer a termly research forum and twice a year, a research study day.

What you will study when

All seminar teaching takes place on Tuesdays.
Years 1and 2:
Observation: One seminar per week
Theory: One seminar/lecture per week
Professional practice supervision. One supervision each week

Year 3:
Policy Process: One seminar each week
Research methods: One seminar each week

Years 4 and 5
Supervision of research projects: as negotiated on an individual basis
Research seminars (one per fortnight)

Requirements for gaining an award

To obtain the professional doctorate: Students must reach the required standard for all written and practice assessments in Part 1 and present a 40000-45000 word original thesis, and satisfy the examiners in an oral examination (viva voce)

To obtain the M Phil: Students must reach the required standard for all written and practice assessments in Part 2 and write a synthesising paper to the required standard

Masters Award Classification

Where a student is eligible for an Masters award then the award classification is determined by calculating the arithmetic mean of all marks and applying the mark obtained as a percentage, with all decimals points rounded up to the nearest whole number, to the following classification

70% - 100%

Distinction

60% - 69%

Merit

50% - 59%

Pass

0% - 49%

Not Passed

Assessment

Teaching, learning and assessment

Teaching and learning

Knowledge is developed through

  • In depth study of psychoanalytic and systemic theory and its application to social work practice
  • Relating this knowledge to the institutional and societal contexts, including the dynamics of marginalisation, exclusion, power and difference
  • Study of the observational method and literature relevant to this
  • Developing capacities to integrate observation, practice, theory and research
  • In depth study of qualitative research methods and their application to social work

Thinking skills are developed through

  • Making increasing links in the three fields
  • The enhancement of thinking and discussion skills in seminars
  • The requirement to individualise learning throughout the programme

Practical skills are developed through

  • -

Skills for life and work (general skills) are developed through

  • Enhancing the transferable skill of making links across theories and paradigms
  • Discussion based seminars
  • Developing the ability to recognise the emotional impact of others on one self and vice versa

Assessment

Knowledge is assessed by

  • Essays in theory and policy
  • Case studies in practice and social policy
  • Linking observational experiences with theory in the observation essay
  • The capacity to develop and implement a research project

Thinking skills are assessed by

  • Integrating theory and practice, policy and observation
  • Developing and implementing the research project
  • Discussion within the groups

Practical skills are assessed by

  • The developing capacity to observe and record
  • Essay and case study writing
  • Writing research reports

Skills for life and work (general skills) are assessed by

  • The ability to hold different points of view
  • Enhanced confidence through group discussion
  • Increasing the capacity to tolerate anxiety when faced with new ideas and challenged by areas of experience inside the self

Quality

How we assure the quality of this programme

Before this programme started

Before this programme started the University checked that:

  • there would be enough qualified staff to teach the programme;
  • adequate resources would be in place;
  • the overall aims and objectives were appropriate;
  • the content of the programme met national benchmark requirements;
  • the programme met any professional/statutory body requirements;
  • the proposal met other internal quality criteria covering a range of issues such as admissions policy, teaching, learning and assessment strategy and student support mechanisms.

This is done through a process of programme approval which involves consulting academic experts including some subject specialists from other institutions.

How we monitor the quality of this programme

The quality of this programme is monitored each year through evaluating:

  • external examiner reports (considering quality and standards);
  • statistical information (considering issues such as the pass rate);
  • student feedback.

Drawing on this and other information, course teams undertake the annual Review and Enhancement Process which is co-ordinated at School level and includes student participation. The process is monitored by the University’s Quality Standing Committee.

Once every six years the University undertakes an in-depth review of the whole field. This is undertaken by a panel that includes at least two external subject specialists. The panel considers documents, looks at student work, speaks to current and former students and speaks to staff before drawing its conclusions. The result is a report highlighting good practice and identifying areas where action is needed.

The role of the programme committee

This programme has a programme committee comprising all relevant teaching staff, student representatives and others who make a contribution towards the effective operation of the programme (e.g. library/technician staff). The committee has responsibilities for the quality of the programme. It provides input into the operation of the Review and Enhancement Process and proposes changes to improve quality. The programme committee plays a critical role in the University's quality assurance procedures.

The role of external examiners

The standard of this programme is monitored by two external examiners. External examiners have two primary responsibilities:

  • To ensure the standard of the programme
  • To ensure that justice is done to individual students


External examiners fulfil these responsibilities in a variety of ways including:

  • Approving exam papers/assignments
  • Attending assessment boards
  • Reviewing samples of student work and moderating marks
  • Ensuring that regulations are followed
  • Providing feedback to the University through an annual report that enables us to make improvements for the future

Listening to the views of students

The following methods for gaining student feedback are used on this programme:

Course Committee meeting once termly (students represent year groups)
Use of the personal tutor system
Termly year group reviews
Feedback forms once yearly

Students are notified of the action taken through: Circulating the minutes of the Course Committee
Termly year group reviews

Listening to the views of others

The following methods are used for gaining the views of other interested parties
The views of employers are obtained through discussions with course tutors

Further Information

Where you can find further information

Further information about this programme is available from:

  • The UEL web site (http://www.uel.ac.uk)
  • The course handbook (will be available from October 2003, see Tavistock website below, ‘student area’)
  • Unit study guides
  • UEL Manual of Regulations and Policies http://www.uel.ac.uk/qa/
  • UEL Quality Manual http://www.uel.ac.uk/qa/
  • Tavistock & Portman NHS Trust website http:www.tavi-port.nhs.uk

Information for screenreader users:

For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description

For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information