|
Final award |
MA |
|
Intermediate awards available |
PGCert, PGDip |
|
UCAS code |
N/A |
|
Details of professional body accreditation |
N/A |
|
Relevant QAA Benchmark statements |
N/A |
|
Date specification last up-dated |
November 2011 |
Analysis of the relationship between community development and refugees as a social group. Main topics studied include forced migration and community responses to refugees and asylum seekers; globalisation, regionalism and forced migration; community and social development issues, comparative welfare; international and regional institutions, policies and conventions; community work for social professionals; and research methods
Applicants are normally required to have a good first degree in a cognate area of study and substantial professional experience in a relevant field. Admission is made on the basis of a written application supported by two satisfactory references and an interview. Decisions will be based on evidence of the following:
In the case of applicants whose first language is not English, then IELTS *** (or equivalent) is required. International qualifications will be checked for appropriate matriculation to UK Higher Education postgraduate programmes.
Students that apply to enter stages of the programme may be admitted through normal Accreditation of Experiential Learning (AEL) or Accreditation of Certificated Learning (ACL) processes, or through an approved articulation agreement. Therefore such applicants must be able to demonstrate and evidence that they have the required learning outcomes as listed in the modules for which they are seeking exemption.
Typically one year full-time; two years part-time. Three compulsory taught modules; choice of one taught modules from eight options; research dissertation.
Lectures, seminars, workshops and tutorials. Group work is encouraged.
All assessment is by coursework: essays, reports, presentations, research proposal, and dissertation. All modules are assessed. The final award takes account of all modules marks.
The programme is especially relevant to employment where there is engagement with refugees and other migrants, including in community work, social services, education, health, welfare, law and legal advice, advocacy, and counselling. It has general relevance to public-sector employment. Projects, including the dissertation, may draw extensively on previous experience.
Some modules give opportunities for group work, especially when assessment includes student presentations. Dissertations provide the opportunity for focused independent research.
Prepares students for employment in areas related to refugee needs in communities, notably in the fields of education, welfare, health, employment, housing, community development, counselling, human rights, and immigration law. Also develops skills appropriate for further academic research in migration and community studies, ethnic and diaspora studies, legal studies, and in social, political, psycho-social and cultural theory.
All students benefit from work in small groups, from an active tutorial system, from training in research methods, to access to a dedicated archive on refugee issues
This programme is designed to give you the opportunity to:
All programmes are credit-rated to help you to understand the amount and level of study that is needed.
One credit is equal to 10 hours of directed study time (this includes everything you do e.g. lecture, seminar and private study).
Credits are assigned to one of 5 levels:
The overall credit-rating of this programme is 180 for Masters, 60 for PGCert, 120 for PGDip.
The typical duration of this programme is 1 full-time or 2 years part-time. It is possible to move from full-time to part-time study and vice-versa to accommodate any external factors such as financial constraints or domestic commitments. Many of our students make use of this flexibility and this may impact on the overall duration of their study period.
The teaching year is divided into two semesters of roughly equal length. A typical student registered in a full-time attendance mode will study two 30 credit modules per semester and a typical student registered in a part-time attendance mode will study one or two modules per semester. The advanced independent research module may occur during the summer period.
Full-time students must complete 180 credits (includes dissertation) in Year 1; part-time students must complete 60 credits in Year 1 and 120 credits (includes dissertation) in year 2.
The following are the core and optional requirements for this programme
|
Year 1 F/T |
Year 2 P/T |
Module title |
credit |
status |
|
1 |
1 |
Introduction to Forced Migration |
30 |
Core |
|
1 |
2 |
Introduction to International Social Work |
30 |
Core |
|
1 |
2 |
Research Methods |
30 |
Core |
|
1 |
1-2 |
Approaches to Public and Community Service |
30 |
Option |
|
1 |
1-2 |
Current Issues in Forced Migration |
30 |
Option |
|
1 |
1-2 |
Governance |
30 |
Option |
|
1 |
1-2 |
International Human Rights |
30 |
Option |
|
1 |
1-2 |
International Refugee Law |
30 |
Option |
|
1 |
1-2 |
Migration, Citizenship & Social Policy |
30 |
Option |
|
1 |
1-2 |
Psycho-Social Perspectives On Forced Migration |
30 |
Option |
|
1 |
1-2 |
30 |
Option |
|
|
1 |
1-2 |
*University Wide Option |
30 |
Option |
|
1 |
2 |
Dissertation |
60 |
Core |
* Subject to the agreement of the Programme Leader
Where a student is eligible for an Masters award then the award classification is determined by calculating the arithmetic mean of all marks and applying the mark obtained as a percentage, with all decimals points rounded up to the nearest whole number, to the following classification
|
70% - 100% |
Distinction |
|
60% - 69% |
Merit |
|
50% - 59% |
Pass |
|
0% - 49% |
Not Passed |
Knowledge is developed through
Thinking skills are developed through
Practical skills are developed through
Skills for life and work (general skills) are developed through
Knowledge is assessed by
Emphasis is placed upon familiarity with a wide range of relevant literature and with key debates in the relevant field
Thinking skills are assessed by
Emphasis is placed upon understanding of topic/s; application of knowledge in making an argument; clarity of arguments; evidence of synthesis and creativity; evidence of independent thought; and originality and distinctiveness of the student's own viewpoint.
Practical skills are assessed by
Emphasis is placed upon evidence of systematic preparation; coherent structure and form of the assessed work; and clarity of expression. In the case of verbal presentations, clear articulation and positive interaction with other members of the class are of importance. In the case of collaborative work, including presentations, emphasis is placed upon positive mutual engagement with other members of the assessed group.
Skills for life and work (general skills) are assessed by
Emphasis is placed upon coherence of assessed work and clarity of expression, whether written or verbal. Students are encouraged to become familiar with various media and visual aids: video, photographs, slides, OHP, PowerPoint etc and to use these in assessed presentations. The research proposal is assessed as an exercise in development of general research skills.
Before this programme started, the following was checked:
This is done through a process of programme approval which involves consulting academic experts including some subject specialists from other institutions.
The quality of this programme is monitored each year through evaluating:
Drawing on this and other information, programme teams undertake the annual Review and Enhancement Process which is co-ordinated at School level and includes student participation. The process is monitored by the Quality and Standards Committee.
Once every six years an in-depth review of the whole field is undertaken by a panel that includes at least two external subject specialists. The panel considers documents, looks at student work, speaks to current and former students and speaks to staff before drawing its conclusions. The result is a report highlighting good practice and identifying areas where action is needed.
This programme has a programme committee comprising all relevant teaching staff, student representatives and others who make a contribution towards the effective operation of the programme (e.g. library/technician staff). The committee has responsibilities for the quality of the programme. It provides input into the operation of the Review and Enhancement Process and proposes changes to improve quality. The programme committee plays a critical role in the quality assurance procedures.
The standard of this programme is monitored by at least one external examiner. External examiners have two primary responsibilities:
External examiners fulfil these responsibilities in a variety of ways including:
The following methods for gaining student feedback are used on this programme:
List the methods that you use e.g.
Students are notified of the action taken through:
Further information about the MA Cultural Studies programme is available from:
For details please contact: Julia Layzell via email: j.layzell@uel.ac.uk.
For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description
For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information