University of East London Homepage


Programme Specification for Psychoanalytic Observational Studies MA

This programme is only offered at: Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust in addition to the alternative locations detailed below.

Final award

MA

Intermediate awards available

Postgraduate Diploma

UCAS code

N/A

Details of professional body accreditation

N/A

Relevant QAA Benchmark statements

Psychology

Date specification last up-dated

January 2011

Profile

The summary - programme advertising leaflet

Programme content

The programme aims to develop students’ capacities to observe infants and young children and themselves in their work setting with children, young people or families.
It has been found that improved observational skills and the experience of observing babies and toddlers enhances the quality of direct work with children and young people in diverse settings, including education, social services, family centres, residential work, in-patient units and in counselling and arts-based therapies. The programme integrates observational tasks (directly with babies and young children) and in the applied setting of the students’ own places of work (all three tasks linked with small seminars led by experienced clinicians) with an introduction to psychoanalytic theory and to child development research and the development of the human personality from birth throughout the life cycle.

Psychoanalytic Observational Studies at UEL

-

Admission requirements

Most students already hold an honours degree or a professional qualification; they are expected to have at least one year’s experience (preferably more) of direct work with children, young people or families: and to be able to bring accounts of current work and interactions to the seminar. They need also to manage the academic requirements of the programme in terms of reading and written work, and, through interview, to be able to discuss their interest in observation and a psychoanalytic frame of reference, and to demonstrate that they will be able to manage the time demands as well as the emotional demands of the programme.

Programme structure

The course is part-time, and is offered either as a day-release course or on two evenings per week. Infant observation and work discussion seminars which are formatively assessed (seminar groups of five students) and reading seminars in Psychoanalytic Theory and Child Development Research are undertaken in the first year, at the end of which students may submit up to a total of two modules of the six required in the two year Postgraduate Diploma programme. (These are Psychoanalytic Theory (3,000-3,500 words) and Child Development Essay (3,000-3500 words) which comprise units 1-2.)

In the second year they continue with and are formally assessed in Infant Observation and Work Discussion, take on a Young Child Observation and its related seminar, as well as continuing with Psychoanalytic Theory and a non-assessed seminar in the Development of the Personality from a psychoanalytic perspective. There are thus four further written assessment units at the end of this second year (Papers of 4,000 words on Infant Observation and Work Discussion, a shorter paper on Young Child Observation (3,000-3,500 words) and a second Psychoanalytic Theory Essay (3,000-3,500 words)). There is provision for students to study fewer units in a given year and proceed through the course at a slower pace (maximum 4 years).

Learning environment

The course is taught either as a one-day or a two evening part-time course. Each seminar lasts for 1 1/4 hours. Infant Observation, Work Discussion and Young Child seminars are taught in groups of 5 with a clinician-seminar leader and are based on detailed presentations of reports of observation or of interactions in the work place. The seminar group work with the facilitation of the seminar leader on the interactions and their meaning, from a psychoanalytic and child development perspective. There are larger reading groups for Psychoanalytic Theory, Child Development Research and Personality Development in which set texts from reading lists are discussed with the seminar leaders. Students are often asked to take it in turn to lead the presentation of some of the reading. The reading list for Personality Development is more flexible.

Assessment

Students are assessed in relation to their developing observational skills, the quality of their written presentations and their contribution to small group seminars. Seminar leaders discuss progress with them. Seminar leaders also communicate at least once a year, and more often if there are difficulties with the students’ personal tutor. The personal tutor is usually a seminar leader for one of the small seminars whom the student sees every week during term time. Formal academic assessment takes the form of the submission of written units at the end of each academic year (the first Wednesday in June). The written submissions are blind-marked (a proportion are double marked and a sample seen by the External Examiner). Students are sent the results of the assessment during August, along with detailed written comments from the markers.

Relevance to work/profession

Students report that the course is highly relevant to their professional work. Most report that they feel their working practice is changed fundamentally by the course, and that they feel their understanding of difficult or troublesome behaviour is enhanced. They also indicate that they feel more able to think under pressure and not to be forced in to premature action.

Thesis/Dissertation/project work

In the third year of the course, upon satisfactory completion of the first two years’ modules and required written work, students who proceed to MA are required to write a dissertation based on one or more of the modules of the course. They are not expected to undertake new research for the dissertation (although very occasionally some do). They are encouraged to think about the data they have gathered within the course or about psychoanalytic or child development literature and to develop a hypothesis which they work on with the aid of individual academic supervision (four to six in total) during two terms of the final year of the course. The dissertation with a maximum of 14,000 words is expected to be at a substantially more advanced level than the written work of the first two years of the course, and to demonstrate some capacity for critical thought and an ability to read literature and research material critically.

Added value

Students undertake this course as a pathway of continuing professional development. The course is a stand-alone course; its completion is also a prerequisite for application to the professional training in child and adolescent psychotherapy.

Your future career

The course offers continuing professional development to professionals working with children, adolescents and families who seek to develop their capacity to observe and to think about the meaning of behaviour from a psychoanalytic vertex. A proportion of students (about 15 per year) are offered places on the professional training in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Some students seek adult psychotherapy training; apply to train as psychoanalysts, or for counselling training. Other students seek promotion within their own professions for example as teachers, social workers, nurses or therapists.

How we support you

All students on the course are offered a lengthy individual interview on application. Once a place is offered students are allocated individual personal tutors whom they see weekly since the personal tutor is also a seminar leader for one of the weekly seminars. In addition all students are offered at least one long tutorial per term as well as having the opportunity to speak to their tutor from time to time as the needs arise. The course is demanding, academically and emotionally and so it is important to provide a high level of personal support. The organising tutor is always willing to speak to individual students and the ethos of the course is that individual need and difficulty are taken very seriously. There is communication between seminar leaders, personal tutors and the organising tutor although requests that discussions are kept confidential are respected. Students who are non-graduates or who struggle with written work are encouraged to talk to their tutors and seminar leaders in order to discuss where particular support may be available. Each year a full-day writing and essay writing workshop is offered at the Tavistock Centre on a Saturday in February or March to encourage students to begin to think about starting written submissions and to seek further support if they need it.

Bonus factors

The Tavistock Clinic is a national and international centre of excellence in training in psychoanalytic and systemic psychotherapy and its applications. The course offers a high standard academic qualification alongside teaching from highly experienced clinicians who are able to offer a course which is firmly based in learning from experience. Students who are seeing primarily to develop their professional skills and abilities, but who are also seeking a postgraduate qualification are able to use the course for both purposes simultaneously.

In 2006-7 the Trust implemented MOODLE. MOODLE is a virtual learning environment accessible to students on courses validated by the Trust’s university partners. Each academic course has been allocated a MOODLE page which contains substantial information and resources. Students can hold virtual meetings in chat rooms and debate over a longer period of time using the discussion forum. MOODLE represents a significant technical advance for the Trust and offers excellent support to students, particularly those studying part-time or at a distance. Students also have access to UEL libraries.

Outcomes

Programme aims and learning outcomes

What is this programme designed to achieve?

This programme is designed to give you the opportunity to:

  • Develop your observational skills at work;
  • Observe the development of a new-born baby through weekly observation and to compare and contrast the observed baby with up to four others to begin to see the rich diversity of healthy child development in a variety of social and cultural contexts;
  • Link detailed observation with psychoanalytic understanding with a background in a critical understanding of current research into child development;
  • Improve your ability to write detailed description and to be able, over time to set detailed description into context in written work and to improved writing skills;
  • Qualify you to apply for the professional training in child psychotherapy;
  • Think about your future career pathway.

What will you learn?

Knowledge

  • Psychoanalytic concepts such as transference, counter-transference, containment, projection, projective identification, splitting, idealisation and denigration, primary and secondary process; the internal world of the baby and child;
  • Understanding of baby and child development and links with the development of the human personality over the life-cycle;
  • Introduction to the history of the development of psychoanalysis;
  • Introduction to what constitutes a therapeutic relationship in all direct work.

Thinking skills

  • The ability to integrate observation and theory in the work setting;
  • The ability to think more clearly in difficult circumstances.

Subject-based practical skills

  • To become an observer and to learn the difficulties and the benefits of remaining in role;
  • To be able to complete postgraduate academic work with increased confidence

Skills for life and work (general skills)

  • Improve written skills and the ability to set out structured argument and discussion;
  • The distinction between factual learning and learning from experience;
  • The significance of working psychotherapeutically and of making emotional contact;
  • To be able to complete postgraduate academic work with increased confidence;
  • To apply a more observational stance to your direct work ;
  • To have time and space to reflect on your future career development.

Structure

The programme structure

Introduction

All programmes are credit-rated to help you to understand the amount and level of study that is needed.

One credit is equal to 10 hours of directed study time (this includes everything you do e.g. lecture, seminar and private study).

Credits are assigned to one of 5 levels:

  • 0 - equivalent in standard to GCE 'A' level and is intended to prepare students for year one of an undergraduate degree programme
  • 1 - equivalent in standard to the first year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
  • 2 - equivalent in standard to the second year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
  • 3 - equivalent in standard to the third year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
  • M - equivalent in standard to a Masters degree

Credit rating

The overall credit-rating of this programme is 180 for Masters, 120 for PgDip.

Typical duration

The programme is a two year postgraduate diploma programme and three year Masters programme but the typical duration to MA is four years, and two or three for PgDip.

How the teaching year is divided

The teaching year is divided into three 10 week terms starting on October and ending in July.

What you will study when

Year

Unit title

credit

status

1

Infant Observation 1

Formatively assessed

Core

1

Work Discussion 1

Formatively assessed

Core

1

Psychoanalytic Theory 1

20

Core

1

Introduction to Child Development Research.

20

Core

2

Infant Observation 1

20

Core

2

Work Discussion 1

20

Core

2

Young Child Observation

20

Core

2

Psychoanalytic Theory 2

20

Core

2

Introduction to the Development of the Personality across the life cycle

Not formally assessed

Core

3

Dissertation

60

Core

Requirements for gaining an award

In order to gain a Postgraduate Diploma, you will need to obtain 120 credits at Level M

In order to obtain a Masters, you will need to obtain 180 credits at Level M. These credits will include a 60 credit level M core unit of advanced independent research.

Masters Award Classification

Where a student is eligible for a Masters award then the award classification is determined by calculating the arithmetic mean of all marks and applying the mark obtained as a percentage, with all decimals points rounded up to the nearest whole number, to the following classification

70% - 100%

Distinction

60% - 69%

Merit

50% - 59%

Pass

0% - 49%

Not Passed

Additional information ...

  1. Complete attendance and required work in all seminars.
  2. Submit first six units of written work and achieve Pass mark in order to step down with PG Diploma. Up to two failed units may be resubmitted.
  3. Proceed to Dissertation when at least four of the six submitted written units are of Good Pass standard. Up to two modules may be resubmitted, and one Pass grade may be compensated by the Assessment Board. The Infant Observation paper cannot be a compensated pass.
  4. Complete dissertation proposal satisfactorily and submit completed dissertation for assessment.

Assessment

Teaching, learning and assessment

Teaching and learning

Small observation and work discussion seminars include the presentation of observational reports or detailed descriptions of interaction in the work situation for discussion and to think about task, context and the meaning of interaction with the facilitation of an experienced clinician seminar leader. These seminars aim to include first and second year students in mixed groups where possible.

Reading/discussion seminars are usually between 10 and 15 students with an experienced seminar leader who facilitates discussion and encourages student to take the lead on presentation of some of the reading. They also allow time for discussion on tackling written essays – a choice is offered to students each year.

Child Development Research lectures are in large group format and feature lecturers of a high status.

The teaching method is principally one of facilitated discussion within the group context, based on an understanding that learning from experience requires time for reflection and needs to be a well-held context where ideas can emerge from all members of the group and total dependence on the seminar leader alone is discouraged. This kind of learning, which can be anxiety provoking at the start, but is generally appreciated as an experience of learning at depth over the two years of the two core seminars in infant observation and work discussion.

Assessment

See above – there is continuous assessment of the tasks of the seminar, and written assessment of submitted modules of written work at the end of each academic year. Seminar leaders offer the support of reading drafts of written work and students in the second year are encouraged to devote one later presentation of a section of one of their written papers, for discussion and consideration by the seminar group.

Assessment of written submissions is coordinated by an assessment tutor who ensures that work is anonymously marked and that students are given written feedback from the markers as well as information about the grade awarded by the Assessment Board which meets in July each year. External examiners see a proportion of all work submitted.

Quality

How we assure the quality of this programme

Before this programme started

Before this programme started the University checked that:

  • there would be enough qualified staff to teach the programme
  • adequate resources would be in place
  • the overall aims and objectives were appropriate
  • the content of the programme met national benchmark requirements
  • the programme met any professional/statutory body requirements
  • the proposal met other internal quality criteria covering a range of issues such as admissions policy, teaching, learning and assessment strategy, and student support mechanisms

This is done through a process of programme approval which involves convening a panel of academic experts including some subject specialists from other institutions. Each panel scrutinises available documents and talks to the staff who will teach the programme before deciding whether it can be approved.

How we monitor the quality of this programme

The quality of this programme is monitored each year through evaluating:

  • external examiner reports (considering quality and standards)
  • statistical information (considering issues such as the pass rate)
  • student feedback

Drawing on this and other information an Annual Review and Enhancement Plan is drawn up by the staff who teach the programme that is reviewed in departmental and Trust-wide Quality Assurance Committee.

Once every five years the University undertakes an in-depth review of the whole subject area. This is undertaken by a panel that includes at least three external subject specialists. The panel considers documents, looks at student work, speaks to current and former students and speaks to staff before drawing its conclusions. The result is a report highlighting good practice and identifying areas where action is needed.

The role of the programme committee

This programme has a programme committee comprising all relevant teaching staff, student representatives and others who make a contribution towards the effective operation of the programme (e.g. library/technician staff). The committee is responsible for the quality of the programme. It oversees preparation of the Annual Quality Improvement Plan and proposes changes to improve quality. The programme/subject area committee plays a critical role in the University's quality assurance procedures.

The role of external examiners

The standard of this programme is monitored by 2 external examiners. External examiners have two primary responsibilities:

  • To ensure the standard of the programme
  • To ensure that justice is done to individual students

External examiners fulfil these responsibilities in a variety of ways including:

  • Approving exam papers/assignments
  • Attending assessment boards
  • Reviewing samples of student work and moderating marks
  • Ensuring that regulations are followed
  • Providing feedback to the University through an annual report that enables us to make improvements for the future

Listening to the views of students

The following methods for gaining student feedback are used on this programme:

  • Anonymous feedback form
  • Seminar group discussion with and without the seminar leader.

Students are notified of the action taken through:

  • programme meetings
  • Communication through seminar leader and personal tutors
  • Written feedback from organising tutor

Listening to the views of others

-

Further Information

Alternative locations for studying this programme

LocationWhich elements?Taught by UEL staffTaught by local staffMethod of Delivery

Belfast

Entire programme

No

Yes

Part-time

Birmingham BTPP

Entire programme

No

Yes

Part-time

Bristol NBT

Entire programme

No

Yes

Block-Release

Alder Hey Childrens Hospital, Liverpool

Entire programme

No

Yes

Part-time

Devon

Entire programme

No

Yes

Part-time

Oxford

Entire programme

No

Yes

Part-time

Florence, Italy

Entire programme
Language of instruction is Italian

No

Yes

Part-time

Milan-Genoa Italy

PG Diploma Language of instruction is Italian

No

Yes

Part-time

Where you can find further information

Further information about this programme is available from:


Information for screenreader users:

For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description

For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information