University of East London Homepage


Programme Specification for Architecture: Interpretation and Theories MA

 

Final award

MA

Intermediate awards available

PG Dip
PG Cert

UCAS code

N/A

Details of professional body accreditation

N/A

Relevant QAA Benchmark statements

N/A

Date specification last up-dated

February 2012

Profile

The summary - programme advertising leaflet

Programme content

The programme takes a current perspective on issues of criticism and interpretation in architecture, and on recent architectural ideas. It has an introduction to architectural interpretation: how to read and how to write architectural texts, including contributions from journalists as well as historians: other key components are on architecture and the poetic, on representation, and on theories of recent architectural practice. The focus of the programme is on building, and developing innovative ways of writing about it. Most of its material involves studying recent books that have developed new ways of thinking about the making of architecture and of interpreting it. There is an openness and sense of enquiry about the work which its students have produced, and it values work which is the development of a personal voice.

This programme forms part of a new and enriched Masters in Architecture programme within the School of Architecture and the Visual Arts, including MSc Computing & Design, MSc Material Matters, MA Sustainability & Design and MA Alternative Urbanisms. The programme is organised in two generic taught modules followed by the Thesis module. The taught Modules comprise a series of distinctive component options designed for each specific award. Students are able to take two options across the practice based components (component 2), based on the individual student’s interest and ability. The programme is an introduction to advanced studies in the history and theory of architecture. It aims to concentrate its debate on the ideas and production of architecture itself: the programme is shaped by a reading of architecture which sees it as inevitably determined by philosophical and cultural issues and deals with the key ideas of the nature of history and criticism, issues of architectural representation, architecture in relationship to the poetic, and theories in modernist and current architectural practice.

MA Architecture: Interpretation and Theories at UEL

The programme is located in the new School of Architecture and the Visual Arts in Docklands, the biggest redevelopment area in Europe. It takes advantage of the University’s London location with visits to architectural sites as well as lectures and visits linking with the culture of the city. Its teachers are abreast of current developments in the field and currently working on publications, conferences and other projects.

This new programme re-frames the offering of the MA Architecture: History and Theory, which has been running successfully since 1996. Over forty graduates of this earlier programme are now teaching at several architectural schools in the UK as well as India and China, or working at a high level in architectural practices in the UK, continental Europe and Asia.

A number of students are currently working at UEL on Ph.Ds in the area on theories and recent history, and participate in regular research seminars.

Admission requirements

Applications are invited from students with first degree or equivalent in architecture or history of art or architecture: other subjects such as literature and philosophy may also provide a suitable background. Applications are welcomed from the EU and overseas, in particular, lecturers from Higher Education Institutions wishing to increase their qualifications.

Students whose first language is not English will have achieved a score of 6.0 in IELTS or equivalent. Eligibility for students without degree equivalent qualifications will be assessed on the basis of a short essay, statement and a portfolio. Places will be offered after a successful interview with a member of the programme team.

This programme has also been designed to attract professionals from practice who are seeking to upgrade their qualifications, or who are looking for the opportunity to validate aspects of their professional remit, or to research and develop internationally relevant cultural issues that they have encountered in professional practice.

Wherever possible, students are invited for interview.

Programme structure

The programme can be followed over twelve months full time or twenty four months part time.

The programme is clearly structured so that each of the components introduces and develops a series of distinctions which the student in turn develops in the formulation of their own work. Seminars, lectures and tutorials provide three ways in which the student's understanding is built up.

Learning environment

Lectures are given by programme staff and visiting lecturers: seminars on previously read texts are led by staff which provide the core of the student’s learning experience: one to one tutorials are given on student’s essay projects. There are also occasional site visits, and generally each year a foreign trip.

Presentations of work in progress in formal settings will provide opportunities for students to make measured judgements on the achievements and progression of both their own projects, and those of their peer group.

Assessment

Postgraduate programmes strictly adhere to the University regulations on assessment. All coursework for assessment is double marked; practical 3d work, seminar papers and presentations, - essay assignments are supervised and double marked.

All significant written work is counted towards the final assessment. Programme work is four essays of 3,500 words, each at least two relating to the core fields of the programme: a Thesis of 12,000-15,000 words provides one third of the programme's final mark.

A student must pass the two taught modules with a minimum overall average mark of 50% in order to begin the dissertation.

Relevance to work/profession

The majority of the programme’s students have been architects, either fully or partly qualified, who have found the programme useful in their being enabled to gain a new understanding of contemporary issues relating to architecture and its practice. It also has been useful in enabling them to develop new professional skills in terms of the writing and presentation of ideas. A number of graduates are now teaching at several architectural Schools in the UK as well as India and China.

Thesis/Dissertation/project work

Crucial to the approach is the emphasis on students’ development of their own ideas in relation to the subjects presented for their study. The essays written for each programme component is the main vehicle for the student’s expression of their research and thinking: the Thesis provides a larger arena for their development of architectural ideas.

Added value

The MA Interpretation & Theories is part of a new Masters structure that allows single and integrated programmes in Architecture, together with MSc Computing & Design, MSc Material Matters, MA Sustainability & Design and MA Alternative Urbanisms.

While this programme is theoretical, students are able to select up to two components from the other masters programmes, subject to approval of the relevant programme team. Details of the available components are found in the relevant Programme Specification and the Masters Programme Handbook.

Architecture it provides an opportunity for students to work alongside design students who are also able to take part of the programme as a component of their Professional Diploma studies.

Your future career

The programme has provided its graduates with opportunities to develop careers as architectural teachers, and also gives their architectural portfolio an added dimension which is useful in furthering their career in practice.

How we support you

The programme offers students a personal tutor, one-to–one tutorial support as well as the support of small group working.

Personal Development Planning (PDP) is a University requirement to engage formally in reflective practice, through a learning log or a professional development portfolio. This includes creating and maintaining a continuously updated CV, a review of progress in modules, review of assessment outcomes and feedback, a semester based action plan and an annual submission of the PDP

The University provides a comprehensive range of support services to students which include : residential/ student finance advice/ careers advise/ study skills development / IT learning resources.

Bonus factors

The programme’s location is in London, which has one of the most vibrant architectural cultures in the world: the programme staff are well connected in relation to London’s architectural institutions and personalities.

Outcomes

Programme aims and learning outcomes

What is this programme designed to achieve?

This programme is designed to give you the opportunity to:

The programme aims to enable students to further their theoretical and critical studies in architecture at a postgraduate level.

  • Introducing students to an advanced body of critical writing which explores issues in architectural theory and architectural history.
  • Augmenting students' skill base in terms of research, criticism and analytical writing
  • Preparing students for professional advancement in architectural research, practice or architectural teaching.

What will you learn?

Knowledge

  • An extensive knowledge of significant literature on architecture of the twentieth century and beyond.
  • Understanding of key issues in relation to modern and current architecture

Thinking skills

  • Analysis
  • Synthesis

Subject-Based Practical skills

  • Writing and constructing short and long written documents
  • Academic research
  • Architecture-specific research

Skills for life and work (general skills)

  • Speaking and writing coherently
  • Working in groups
  • Working to deadlines
  • Ability to be open to new ideas
  • Learn through reflection on own research, practice and experience

Structure

The programme structure

Introduction

All programmes are credit-rated to help you to understand the amount and level of study that is needed.

One credit is equal to 10 hours of directed study time (this includes everything you do e.g. lecture, seminar and private study).

Credits are assigned to one of 5 levels:

  • 0 - equivalent in standard to GCE 'A' level and is intended to prepare students for year one of an undergraduate degree programme
  • 1 - equivalent in standard to the first year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
  • 2 - equivalent in standard to the second year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
  • 3 - equivalent in standard to the third year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
  • M - equivalent in standard to a Masters degree

Credit rating

The overall credit-rating of this programme is 180 for the degree of Master, 120 for a Postgraduate Diploma and 60 for Postgraduate Certificate

Typical duration

The typical duration of this programme is twelve months full-time or twenty four months part-time. It is possible to move from full-time to part-time study and vice-versa to accommodate any external factors such as financial constraints or domestic commitments. Many of our students make use of this flexibility and this may impact on the overall duration of their study period.

How the teaching year is divided

The teaching year begins in October and ends in September: there are two year-long 60 credit modules in parallel over A & B, with a third module over the Summer period for the Thesis. A full-time student will study the equivalent of 180 credits over the year. A typical part-time student will study one 30 credit component per Semester.

What you will study when

The Masters in Architecture Programmes are structured in two generic taught modules followed by the Thesis Module.

All modules are core modules: T three modules over twelve months are completed for the full time programme: one module is completed for the first year of the part time programme and one module for the second year of the part time programme, followed by the Thesis module.

The following are the core and optional requirements for the single and major pathways for this programme

Year

Module title

credit

status

1

ARM 151 Architecture & Urbanisms: Tools, Principles, Theories & Practice:

60

Core

1

Component 1: Tools, Principles & Theories
Histories and Criticism

  • Questions of Interpretation
  • Ways of writing
  • Modernist Histories: Pevsner and Giedion
  • Loss of Consensus: Banham and Venturi
  • Foucault and architecture as discourse
  • Tafuri and the problem of the architect
  • Derrida and the ungrounding of structure
  • Barthes and mythology
  • Other Histories: Colomina and Bloomer

-

Core

-

Component 2: Advanced Practice 1
Architectural Representation

  • Orthographies
  • Evans: Translation of drawing to building
  • Drawing Assemblages
  • The Diagram and the Fold
  • The Architectural Image
  • Site work
  • Architecture in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
  • Colomina: Architecture and Media
  • Film and the City
  • Architecture and the moving image
  • New Practices

Details of further component 2 options can be found in the programme specifications for MSc Computing & Design / MSc Material Matters / MA Sustainability & Design / MA Alternative Urbanisms.

-

Option

1/2

ARM152 Architecture & Urbanisms: Theories, Context & Practice

60

Core

-

Component 1: Theories and Contexts Modernist and Current Theories

  • Modern Architecture and Modernity
  • Modernist Theories
  • Building the Modern City
  • The Smithsons and new urban form
  • Team X: Cities and Houses
  • Situationist Theories
  • Archigram and Price
  • Tschumi and the pleasures of architecture
  • Architecture, the body and the city
  • New materialities: Salter and Caruso St John
  • Research as design
  • Global Architecture: Koolhaas
  • Architecture and Gender
  • Postcolonial theory and architecture
  • Architecture and the user
  • Architecture and the Everyday

-

Core

-

Component 2: Advanced Practice 2 Architecture and the poetic

  • Introduction to Poetics
  • The House
  • Subjective writing
  • Harbison
  • Writing the City
  • Bachelard and the Dwelling
  • Heidegger and the work of Art
  • Norberg Schulz
  • Harries and Vesely
  • Louis Kahn and the order of things
  • Pallasmaa : Architecture and the senses
  • Holl and questions of pperception
  • Zumthor and architectural phenomenology

Details of further component 2 options can be found in the programme specifications for MSc Computing & Design / MSc Material Matters / MA Sustainability & Design / MA Alternative Urbanisms.

-

Option

1/2

ARM153
Thesis

60

Core

-

TOTAL

180

-

Requirements for gaining an award

In order to gain a Postgraduate Certificate, you will need to obtain 60 credits at Level M.

In order to gain a Postgraduate Diploma, you will need to obtain 120 credits at Level M

In order to obtain a Masters, you will need to obtain 180 credits at

Level M. These credits will include a 60 credit level M core module of advanced independent research.

Masters Award Classification

Where a student is eligible for an Masters award then the award classification is determined by calculating the arithmetic mean of all marks and applying the mark obtained as a percentage, with all decimals points rounded up to the nearest whole number, to the following classification

70% - 100%

Distinction

60% - 69%

Merit

50% - 59%

Pass

0% - 49%

Not Passed

Assessment

Teaching, learning and assessment

Teaching and learning

Knowledge is developed through

  • Lectures
  • Seminars
  • Reading

Thinking skills are developed through

  • Reading
  • Writing
  • Seminars

Practical skills are developed through

  • Reading
  • Writing
  • Seminars

Skills for life and work (general skills) are developed through

  • Seminars
  • Writing

Assessment

Since the programme assessment is integrated in the assessment of the coursework essays and Thesis, Knowledge, Thinking skills, Practical skills and Skills for life and work (general skills) are assessed by means of the assessment of the written course work produced.

Quality

How we assure the quality of this programme

Before this programme started

Before the programme started, the following was checked:

  • there would be enough qualified staff to teach the programme;
  • adequate resources would be in place;
  • the overall aims and objectives were appropriate;
  • the content of the programme met national benchmark requirements;
  • the programme met any professional/statutory body requirements;
  • the proposal met other internal quality criteria covering a range of issues such as admissions policy, teaching, learning and assessment strategy and student support mechanisms.

This is done through a process of programme approval which involves consulting academic experts including some subject specialists from other institutions.

How we monitor the quality of this programme

The quality of this programme is monitored each year through evaluating:

  • external examiner reports (considering quality and standards);
  • statistical information (considering issues such as the pass rate);
  • student feedback.

Drawing on this and other information, course teams undertake the annual Review and Enhancement Process which is co-ordinated at School level and includes student participation. The process is monitored by the Quality and Standards Committee.

Once every six years an in-depth review of the whole field is undertaken by a panel that includes at least two external subject specialists. The panel considers documents, looks at student work, speaks to current and former students and speaks to staff before drawing its conclusions. The result is a report highlighting good practice and identifying areas where action is needed.

The role of the programme committee

This programme has a programme committee comprising all relevant teaching staff, student representatives and others who make a contribution towards the effective operation of the programme (e.g. library/technician staff). The committee has responsibilities for the quality of the programme. It provides input into the operation of the Review and Enhancement Process and proposes changes to improve quality. The programme committee plays a critical role in the quality assurance procedures.

The role of external examiners

The standard of this programme is monitored by at least one external examiner. External examiners have two primary responsibilities:

  • To ensure the standard of the programme;
  • To ensure that justice is done to individual students.

External examiners fulfil these responsibilities in a variety of ways including:

  • Approving exam papers/assignments;
  • Attending assessment boards;
  • Reviewing samples of student work and moderating marks;
  • Ensuring that regulations are followed;
  • Providing feedback through an annual report that enables us to make improvements for the future.

Listening to the views of students

The following methods for gaining student feedback are used on this programme:

  • Module evaluations and feedback questionnaires
  • Student representation on programme committees (meeting 3 times year)
  • Year group meetings (up to 4 per semester)
  • Module and Group seminars
  • Tutorials
  • Personal Project proformas

Students are notified of the action taken through:

  • circulating the minutes of the programme committee
  • providing details on the programme notice board
  • Group meetings
  • Web CT publication

Listening to the views of others

The following methods are used for gaining the views of other interested parties:

  • Questionnaires to former students
  • Industrial liaison committee
  • Placements Officer
  • Discourse with visiting practitioners
  • Feedback from exhibitions etc.

Further Information


Information for screenreader users:

For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description

For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information