University of East London Homepage


Programme Specification for Information Security Prof.Doc

This programme is only offered at: UEL

Final award

DInfoSec

Intermediate awards available

PGDip in Professional Information Security
PGCert in Professional Information Security

UCAS code

N/A

Details of professional body accreditation

N/A

Relevant QAA Benchmark statements

N/A

Date specification last up-dated

November 2011

Profile

The summary - programme advertising leaflet

Programme content

The Programme aims to develop research-based practice in professionals working within the Information Security area. As a result of the rapid growth in both the availability of global information structures (e.g. internet) and the number of users, information security professionals are facing major challenges to provide services that are accessible and yet safe. Keeping business channels flexible and easy to use whilst guarding against the e-criminal is the on-going project.

The IT and Internet Law module provides a background to governance of the technology and the humans who use it whilst Seizure and Examination of Computer Systems provides a response platform for situations where potentially a crime has been committed.

The Professional Doctorate in Information Security believes research is fundamental to maintaining this balance between access and safety. Applied Research Tools and Techniques provides a basis to develop in the student a sophisticated toolset of research techniques. This is augmented in Research Methods for Technologists with highly specialised approaches.

There are three modules tailored to link the student’s workplace with their research-based learning: Work-based Planning, Work-based Practice and Project Portfolio.

The Research Conference module is designed to encourage more reflective, innovative ways of presenting research findings and responding to feedback.

The Research Thesis, lasting over 3 years, connects the research, student work experience and the challenges faced by modern technological infrastructures.

The Programme is currently unique in offering a professional doctoral qualification in the expanding but still relatively modern area of information security. Most of the Programme is based on negotiated learning, where students construct research-based learning around their interests and life experience. Three of the modules are purely workplace-focussed and will require tutors visiting the student and their employer.  

Studying at UEL

-

Admission requirements

All students admitted to the Programme must have at least recent 5 years in a senior position within the information security area and on entry be employed in the same discipline. All applications will be reviewed by at least two members of academic staff who will make a decision on whether to interview or not. Interviews, where the final decision will be made, will also be conducted by at least two academic staff.

The Professional Doctorate complies with regulations controlled by UEL Graduate School. In accordance with Points 2.1 thru 2.6 of Part 9 of the Research degrees regulations, the Programme has the following regulations:

The normal entry requirement for the degree of PhD via MPhil registration or Professional Doctorate is a first or upper second class Honours degree of a United Kingdom Higher Education Institution, or a qualification which is regarded by Research Degrees Subcommittee as equivalent to such (e.g. a verifiable overseas qualification).

Applications from candidates holding qualifications and/or experience other than those set out in 2.1 & 2.2 will be considered by Research Degrees Subcommittee on their merits and in relation to the nature and scope of the programme of work proposed.

In considering applicants our University will look for evidence of a candidate's ability and background knowledge in relation to the proposed field of study.  Professional experience or publications, written reports or other appropriate evidence of accomplishment will be taken into consideration.  Research Degrees Subcommittee may require an applicant to pass an externally assessed qualifying examination at final year Honours degree level, arranged by our University, before admission is approved.

Where English is not the applicant’s first language, a minimum IELTS Academic English, or such qualifications as our University deems comparable, score of 7.0 overall, with a minimum of 6.5 in all components, is required at entry for Professional Doctorate students. Such assessment of English language competence must normally have been undertaken no more than two years prior to application, though relevant and more recent study in a United Kingdom Higher Education Institution may be accepted as sufficient proof of ability.

Programme structure

The Programme is offered in part-time mode only lasting six years. Each year consists of three trimesters; eight covering the taught modules and a capstone Research Thesis constitutes the other ten.

Learning environment

A variety of learning methods are used including: one module of Distance Learning; three modules of largely work-based supervision; a Block mode module; two research modules offering lab sessions as well as specialised guest lectures; a conference based module; and a supervised thesis. In addition a highly interactive website will support student learning.

Assessment

Seven of the taught Programme modules are assessed coursework or presentation. Only one has an exam. The Research Thesis is examined by oral examination by either one internal and one external or two external examiners.

All assessed components are to be submitted to turnitin.com and controlled accordingly by the module leader who will report to the Programme Leader and the relevant Board where excessive copying or plagiarism occurs.

Relevance to work/profession

As stated above only one of the modules involves an examination. All other components across the Programme are in part through negotiated learning where students have input to the focus of their coursework. Of course students are actively encouraged to negotiate learning centred on their workplace issues. In addition during the three work-based modules it is compulsory to use work-based material.

Thesis/Dissertation/project work

All taught modules involve assessment equivalent to 5000 M or D level words. All D level modules are largely research based and to a certain but lesser extent so are the M level ones. The Research Thesis is equivalent to 50000 D level words and must be of a potentially publishable and professional standard.

Registration of the research component can only take place following a recommendation from the relevant School Research Degrees Sub-Committee to the university Research Degrees Subcommittee of the suitability of the candidate to undertake research, of the programme of research, of the supervision arrangements and of the research environment.  These approvals require appropriate academic judgement to be brought to bear on the viability of each research proposal. 

Candidates for a Professional Doctorate must successfully complete all assessed elements of their programme before award of the degree can be made.
During the Programme’s research stage, a Panel reviews the student’s progress annually. This Panel is comprised of staff with appropriate academic and professional expertise; all must be independent of the candidate’s supervisory team.  The School Research Degrees Sub-Committee and the University Research Degrees Subcommittee monitor the reports from these Panels.

The examination of the research component of the Professional Doctorate has two stages: firstly the submission and preliminary assessment of the research; and secondly its defence by oral examination.

Added value

This is an extremely flexible programme that facilitates the professional and academic learning of information security students at different stages of their careers. It offers a range of post-qualifying and academic awards –including the Professional Doctorate in Information Security. This is the only professional doctorates in the UK and unique, in that it provides a practice based programme, emphasising learning from experience, leading to various intermediate qualifications and, ultimately, the professional doctorate.

Your future career

The target group are those, employed in the Information Security area, seeking to enhance the research dimension of their work via a qualification that is tailored to their professional needs. At least in part due to a result of their involvement in the Professional Doctorate, students regularly find enhanced employment status in the Information Security area. All students are employed in the area when they join the programme and remain so after, often having furthered their career position.

How we support you

At the commencement of the programme students are given an explicit overview of the total programme teaching and learning activities, assignments, organisation, structure and progression. An annually updated Programme Handbook helps guide the student through the Programme.

The Programmer Leader along with both the Research Methods leader and the Work-Based Learning leaders deal with the students day-to-day academic issues. In addition supervisor and personal tutors provide academic and personal support throughout the Programme.

The University Counselling, Disability, Dyslexia and Student Support Services provide more specialist help.

The Graduate School is responsible for providing a focus to the support of our postgraduate research students and for our institution’s research and scholarly strategy.

Professional Doctorate students will have at least two and not normally more than three supervisors, who together demonstrate an appropriate range of academic and professional experience.  One supervisor shall be the Director of Studies with responsibility to supervise the candidate on a regular and frequent basis. During the Research Thesis supervisors meet their students, either physically or virtually, at least once a month. Documentary evidence of these meetings are kept as part of the student’s record.

Bonus factors

-

Outcomes

Programme aims and learning outcomes

What is this programme designed to achieve?

This programme is designed to give you the opportunity to:

  • Develop research skills to empower you as a professional information security expert
  • Foster reflective and analytic approaches to work-based practice
  • Produce high-quality research output

What will you learn?

A candidate who is awarded a Professional Doctorate will be expected to have achieved the following learning outcomes:

Created and interpreted new knowledge, through original research, or other advanced scholarship, of a quality to satisfy peer review, which extends the forefront of the discipline and merits publication;

Systematically acquired an understanding of a substantial body of knowledge that is at the forefront of an academic discipline or area of professional practice;

The general ability to conceptualise, design and implement a project for the generation of new knowledge, application or understanding at the forefront of the discipline and to adjust the project design in the light of unforeseen problems;

A detailed understanding of applicable techniques for research and advanced academic enquiry;

Ability to make informed judgements on complex issues in specialist fields, often in the absence of complete data, and be able to communicate their ideas and conclusions clearly and effectively to specialist and non-specialist audiences;

Ability to continue to undertake pure and/or applied research and development at an advanced level, contributing substantially to the development of new techniques, ideas or approaches;

The qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment requiring the exercise of personal responsibility and largely autonomous initiative in complex and unpredictable situations, in professional or equivalent environments.

Knowledge

  • Analyse high level research in the area of Information Security
  • Produce knowledge in the form of doctoral level research output
  • Evaluate the value of knowledge in the Information Security area

Thinking skills

  • Critical analysis of research
  • Reflection on your practice
  • Ability to make cross-disciplinary connections

Subject-Based Practical skills

  • Using sophisticated software tools to enhance your research
  • Produce scholarly work that is concise, justified and structure to a high standard
  • Using a multi-dimensional approach to investigative research

Skills for life and work (general skills)

  • Develop sophisticated presentation skills
  • Appreciation and response to critical and positive feedback
  • Sophisticated communication skills

Structure

The programme structure

Introduction

All programmes are credit-rated to help you to understand the amount and level of study that is needed.

One credit is equal to 10 hours of directed study time (this includes everything you do e.g. lecture, seminar and private study).

Credits on the Professional Doctorate in Information Security are one of 2 levels:

  • M         equivalent in standard to a Masters degree
  • D         equivalent in standard to a Doctorate degree

Credit rating

From September 2011 Professional Doctorate programmes are to be governed by an institutional credit framework and the Professional Doctorate in Information Security is fully compliant.

Typical duration

The normal minimum and maximum periods of registration for a Professional Doctorate in part-time mode are as follows:

Part-time 45 months (Minimum) 60 months (Maximum)

Registration is governed by rules, such as those above, which are administered by the Graduate School. On the Professional Doctorate in Information Security registration will typically take place around 12-18 months after joining the Programme. Registration is achieved by the completion of a document, available on the Graduate School pages of the UEL website, which provides a proposal for the student’s research thesis. It is at this point that the supervisory team is identified and entered on the form. Each registration document is evaluated by CITE’s Research Degrees Sub-Committee (RDSC).

Consequently the figures above do not represent the period the student will spend on the Programme but rather the period for which they are registered. Under normal circumstances are student can therefore be unable to have their research thesis examined unless they have been registered for 45 months. Where normal circumstances are thought to not apply the supervisory team are required to make a written case to the RDSC who will, if they consider the case has merit, forward it to the UEL Research Committee for approval. Likewise the normal maximum period refers to the registration period and if a student is deemed by their supervisors to justify an extension of this period an application must be made to the RDSC. In addition under normal circumstances students will not remain on the Programme for a total period exceeding 72 months; students with exceptional circumstances with a case for an extension beyond this period, need to also be presented to the RDSC.

How the teaching year is divided

PROGRAMME STRUCTURE

TAUGHT - 240 CREDITS

Year 1

Semester A

Module 1:  IT and Internet Law (Distance Learning mode) (M 30).
Including:

  • Intellectual Property
  • Computer Misuse
  • Cyber-crimes
  • Consumer Protection 

Assessment: Assignment 1 and Assignment 2 (combined equivalence 5000 words)

Year 1

Semester B

Module 2: Seizure and Examination of Computer Systems (M 30)
Including:

  • Computer Crime Investigation
  • Incident Response
  • Storage and Analysis of Evidence
  • Documentation 

Assessment: Assignment 3 and Exam 4 (combined equivalence 5000 words)

Year 1

Semester C

Module 3: Applied Research Tools and Techniques (D 30)
Including:

  • Mathematics and Statistics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Data Mining
  • Dynamic Modelling 

Assessment: Assignment 5 (equivalence 5000 words)

Year 2

Semester A 

Module 4:  Work-based Planning (M 30).
Including:

  • Planning in projects
  • Decision Making
  • Tool use
  • Evaluation 

Assessment: Assignment 6 (equivalence 5000 words)

Year 2

Semester B

Module 5: Work-Based Practice (M 30)
Including:

  • Control
  • Monitoring
  • Tool use
  • Efficiency and Efficacy 

Assessment: Assignment 7 (equivalence 5000 words)

Year 2

Semester C

Module 6: Research Methods for Technologists (D 30)
Including:

  • Knowledge production
  • Proposal construction
  • Digitalised research approaches
  • Health, Legal and Ethical issues 

Assessment: Assignment 8 (equivalence 5000 words)

Year 3

Semester A

Module 7:  Project Portfolio (M 30).
Including:

  • Planning and archiving data
  • Reflection
  • Measurement of success
  • Analysis 

Assessment: Assignment 9 (equivalence 5000 words)

Year 3

Semester B

Module 8: Research Conference (D 30)
Including:

  • Identifying a suitable topic
  • Writing a research paper
  • Experimenting with Methodologies
  • Presentation and Defence 

Assessment: Assignment 10 and Presentation 11 (combined equivalence 5000 words)

 

RESEARCH - 300 CREDITS

Students on the programme from Semester C of Year 3 until the end of year six will complete a Research Thesis of approximately 50000 words showing that they have made an original contribution to the Information Security profession as specified in the UEL PGR Code of Practice and the regulations for postgraduate research programmes.
The Thesis is examined either by one internal and one external examiner or two external examiners. The Chair of the Thesis examination is an internal staff member.

TOTAL CREDITS - 540

What you will study when

All modules are core and are the structure is shown above

Semester 

Level

UEL Module
Code

Module Title

Credit

Status

M

SDM903

IT and Internet Law (DL)

30

Core

M

SDM026

Seizure & Examination of Computer Systems

30

Core

D

SDD001

Applied Research Tools & Techniques

30

Core

M

SDM801

Work-based Planning

30

Core

M

SDM802

Work-based Practice

30

Core

D

SDD002

Research Methods for Technologists

30

Core

M

SDM803

Project Portfolio

30

Core

D

SDD003

Research Conference

30

Core

A, B, C 

 

 

Research Thesis

300

Core

Requirements for gaining an award

Postgraduate Diploma in Professional Information Security
A student who successfully completes 120 credits (Level M or D) of taught modules, including SDM903 and SDM026, on the Professional Doctorate programme is eligible for the Award of Postgraduate Diploma in Professional Information Security.

Postgraduate Certificate in Professional Information Security
A student who successfully completes 60 credits (Level M or D) of taught modules, including SDM903 or SDM026 or both, on the Professional Doctorate programme is eligible for the Award of Postgraduate Certificate in Professional Information Security.

Masters Award Classification

Where a student is eligible for an Masters award then the award classification is determined by calculating the arithmetic mean of all marks and applying the mark obtained as a percentage, with all decimals points rounded up to the nearest whole number, to the following classification

70% - 100%

Distinction

60% - 69%

Merit

50% - 59%

Pass

0% - 49%

Not Passed

Assessment

Teaching, learning and assessment

Teaching and learning

A variety of learning methods are used including: one module of Distance Learning; three modules of largely work-based supervision; a Block mode module; two research modules offering lab sessions as well as specialised guest lectures; a conference based module; and a supervised thesis. In addition a highly interactive website will support student learning.

Knowledge is developed through

  • Research for coursework and the Research Thesis
  • Class discussion both off and online
  • Lab work
  • Reflection on your workplace activity
  • Supervised Tutorials

Thinking skills are developed through

  • Designing and completing negotiated assessment
  • Class discussion
  • Reflection and Analysis of Work-Based activity

Practical skills are developed through

  • Lab sessions
  • Work-based and Research Methods modules
  • Group-work

Skills for life and work (general skills) are developed through

  • Lab work
  • Research Methods modules
  • Coursework and Research Thesis construction
  • Presentations and communications
  • Group-work

Assessment

Assessment takes a variety of forms including: examination (one module); written individual or group coursework; lab work; research thesis.

Knowledge is assessed by

  • Examination
  • Presentation
  • Written coursework and Research Thesis

Thinking skills are assessed by

  • Written coursework and Research Thesis
  • Presentation

Practical skills are assessed by

  • Presentation
  • Lab work
  • Coursework

Skills for life and work (general skills) are assessed by

  • Coursework
  • Lab work
  • Group-work

Quality

How we assure the quality of this programme

Before this programme started

Before this programme started, the following was checked:

  • there would be enough qualified staff to teach the programme;
  • adequate resources would be in place;
  • the overall aims and objectives were appropriate;
  • the content of the programme met national benchmark requirements;
  • the programme met any professional/statutory body requirements;
  • the proposal met other internal quality criteria covering a range of issues such as admissions policy, teaching, learning and assessment strategy and student support mechanisms.

This is done through a process of programme approval which involves consulting academic experts including some subject specialists from other institutions.

How we monitor the quality of this programme

The quality of this programme is monitored each year through evaluating:

  • external examiner reports (considering quality and standards);
  • statistical information (considering issues such as the pass rate);
  • student feedback.

Drawing on this and other information, programme teams undertake the annual Review and Enhancement Process which is co-ordinated at School level and includes student participation.  The process is monitored by the Quality and Standards Committee.
Once every six years an in-depth review of the whole field is undertaken by a panel that includes at least two external subject specialists.  The panel considers documents, looks at student work, speaks to current and former students and speaks to staff before drawing its conclusions.  The result is a report highlighting good practice and identifying areas where action is needed.

The role of the programme committee

This programme has a programme committee comprising all relevant teaching staff, student representatives and others who make a contribution towards the effective operation of the programme (e.g. library/technician staff).  The committee has responsibilities for the quality of the programme. It provides input into the operation of the Review and Enhancement Process and proposes changes to improve quality.  The programme committee plays a critical role in the quality assurance procedures.

The role of external examiners

The standard of this programme is monitored by at least one external examiner.  External examiners have two primary responsibilities:

  • To ensure the standard of the programme;
  • To ensure that justice is done to individual students.

External examiners fulfil these responsibilities in a variety of ways including:

  • Approving exam papers/assignments;
  • Attending assessment boards;
  • Reviewing samples of student work and moderating marks;
  • Ensuring that regulations are followed;
  • Providing feedback through an annual report that enables us to make improvements for the future.

Listening to the views of students

The following methods for gaining student feedback are used on this programme:

  • Module evaluations
  • Student representation on programme committees (meeting 3 times year)
  • Student/Staff consultative committee (meeting 2 times a year)

Students are notified of the action taken through:

  • Circulating the minutes of the programme committees
  • A newsletter published three times a year
  • Providing details on the programme website

Listening to the views of others

The following methods are used for gaining the views of other interested parties:

  • Questionnaires to former students
  • Annual student satisfaction questionnaire
  • Industrial liaison committee, chaired by the Programme Leader with members comprising mainly of a representative sample of student employees and companies with well-established links with UEL
  • Feedback forms from meetings at student workplaces
  • Regular liaison with professional bodies

Further Information

Where you can find further information

Further information about this programme is available from:


Information for screenreader users:

For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description

For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information