|
Final award |
MA |
|
Intermediate awards available |
PG Cert PG Dip |
|
UCAS code |
N/A |
|
Details of professional body accreditation |
N/A |
|
Relevant QAA Benchmark statements |
Psychology |
|
Date specification last up-dated |
January 2011 |
The programme is designed as career development training for teachers and other staff in nursery, infant, primary, secondary and special education, as well as universities and other institutions of further and higher education. The aim of the programme is to increase awareness of the emotional factors which enter into learning and teaching, and the psychological problems which children and young people face in the course of their development. The programme seeks to foster in those engaged in the field of education, a greater understanding of themselves in their roles and the factors which help and hinder the educative process.
The programme is open to qualified teachers and others working in a professional capacity with children, adolescents or adults in an educational setting. Applicants should be graduates and should have at least two years experience of working in an educational establishment.
The programme is a part-time programme, taking place one evening a week in term-time. The PGCert/PGDip/MA Emotional Factors in Learning and Teaching. Counselling Aspects in Education is an integrated programme of studies at Masters Level. Students will follow a standard admissions procedure for each of the programmes and will be admitted if they satisfy the entry criteria .
The core teaching events in years one and two include lectures and work discussion groups, and in the second year there is the addition of an experiential group. In the first year the emphasis is on individual development and interpersonal interaction whilst in year two, the focus shifts to group and institutional dynamics. In the third year, or dissertation year, students form their dissertation proposals in a group seminar before moving on to work with an assigned dissertation supervisor. Tutorial support is provided throughout the programme.
Assessment is by three written submissions in Year One and three in Year Two. The essays relate to the lecture series, to reading and to the learning which takes place in the small work discussion groups. Students are expected to demonstrate that they understand theoretical concepts and that they can apply their understanding to their own practice as teachers and to the difficulties they observe in children and young people. There is also an expectation that students will reflect on their learning experience on the programme and will use this material in their essays.
The programme is designed to enhance the teacher’s capacity for self reflection in their professional roles as well as their understanding of the children and young people with whom they work. The success of the programme depends on students being able to make use of the ideas in their everyday working lives, to the benefit of themselves and of their pupils.
The essay assignments are designed to enable students to follow aspects of the programme which most interest them and which they find most useful in their professional lives. They are expected to demonstrate a grasp of theory and show evidence of reading, but there is also an expectation that theory will be applied to practice.
The dissertation may be written on any aspect of the programme which has particularly interested the student. It is likely to be based on a combination of theory and observational material but might include some limited empirical research.
Some candidates are already qualified and experienced teachers. However, completion of this programme would be beneficial for those seeking promotion within the profession. It also provides opportunities for teachers to work closely with tutors who are health professionals and provides some opportunity to think about possible pathways for those who are seeking a career change. There is the opportunity, for example, to move into a linked professional training in counselling in educational settings.
Completion of the programme is beneficial to those seeking promotion within the profession, both in management and in pastoral care.
Students are supported by a personal tutor with whom they meet usually twice termly. Tutors provide support in the planning of assignments and who are available to think about the student’s experience of the programme and plans for future learning and career development.
The Tavistock is an internationally renowned centre of excellence for psychoanalytic studies, research and clinical work with children, young people and families. Students have the opportunity to attend a variety of lectures, papers and scientific events and after completion of the programme may opt to join the Allied Professionals section of the Tavistock Society of Psychotherapists.
The programme aims to provide a career development opportunity which will both improve the quality of the teacher’s professional life and enhance his/her capacity to teach effectively.
The programme aims to provide a framework for thinking about the development of the personality from birth to adulthood and to link this with an understanding of the pre-requisites for effective teaching and learning and the factors which inhibit both.
The programme aims to promote the use of psychoanalytic observational skills in classrooms and to enable teachers to apply psychoanalytic understanding to what they observe and to develop a wider range of strategies to help and support children.
Knowledge
Thinking skills
Subject-Based Practical skills
Skills for life and work (general skills)
To be aware of issues of difference and to promote thoughtful, anti-discriminatory practice.
All programmes are credit-rated to help you to understand the amount and level of study that is needed.
One credit is equal to 10 hours of directed study time (this includes everything you do e.g. lecture, seminar and private study).
Credits are assigned to one of 5 levels:
The overall credit-rating of this programme is 180 for the M.A., 120 for PGDip. and 60 for PGCert.
The programme is one year to PGCert, two to PGDip and three to MA. Students sometimes choose to take an extra year over their dissertation.
The teaching year consists of three terms of ten weeks duration with breaks at Christmas, Easter and in the summer. There is a half term break in the spring term and a reading week in the middle of the summer term.
Year One (PG Cert)
Year Two (PG Dip)
Year Three (MA)
| Level | Unit Title | Credits For Assessment | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
M |
Theory 1 |
PGCert |
20 |
|
M |
Portfolio |
PGCert |
20 |
|
M |
Work Discussion 1 |
PGCert |
20 |
|
M |
Theory 2 |
PGDip |
20 |
|
M |
Professional Development |
PGDip |
20 |
|
M |
Work Discussion 2 |
PGDip |
20 |
|
M |
Dissertation |
MA |
60 |
Where a student is eligible for an Masters award then the award classification is determined by calculating the arithmetic mean of all marks and applying the mark obtained as a percentage, with all decimals points rounded up to the nearest whole number, to the following classification
|
70% - 100% |
Distinction |
|
60% - 69% |
Merit |
|
50% - 59% |
Pass |
|
0% - 49% |
Not Passed |
In years one and two, three written submissions are assessed and are graded as either pass, merit or not passed. Merit grades and Distinctions are indicative of the capacity to write an MA dissertation. Feedback is given on written assignments, providing guidelines for future improvement/development.
Before this programme started, the following was checked:
This is done through a process of programme approval which involves consulting academic experts including some subject specialists from other institutions.
The quality of this programme is monitored each year through evaluating:
Drawing on this and other information, programme teams undertake the annual Review and Enhancement Process which is co-ordinated at School level and includes student participation. The process is monitored by the Quality and Standards Committee.
Once every six years an in-depth review of the whole field is undertaken by a panel that includes at least two external subject specialists. The panel considers documents, looks at student work, speaks to current and former students and speaks to staff before drawing its conclusions. The result is a report highlighting good practice and identifying areas where action is needed.
This programme has a programme committee comprising all relevant teaching staff, student representatives and others who make a contribution towards the effective operation of the programme (e.g. library/technician staff). The committee has responsibilities for the quality of the programme. It provides input into the operation of the Review and Enhancement Process and proposes changes to improve quality. The programme committee plays a critical role in the quality assurance procedures.
The standard of this programme is monitored by at least one external examiner. External examiners have two primary responsibilities:
External examiners fulfil these responsibilities in a variety of ways including:
The following methods for gaining student feedback are used on this programme:
Students are notified of the action taken through:
The following methods are used for gaining the views of other interested parties:
Further information about this programme is available from:
For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description
For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information