|
Final award |
MA |
|
Intermediate awards available |
PGCert, PGDip |
|
UCAS code |
N/A |
|
Details of professional body accreditation |
N/A |
|
Relevant QAA Benchmark statements |
N/A |
|
Date specification last up-dated |
April 2012 |
The MA in Education is designed specifically for educational professionals who wish to engage critically with new developments in teaching, and develop practice in their work context with academic and practical rigour.
Through engagement in critical, analytical and reflective processes, participants will be able to:
Entry requirements are flexible to allow for credit to be given to work based learning through AEL (Accreditation of Experiential Learning)
Applicants must:
Applicants will be advised in discussion which route to take (see ‘what you will study when’)
| Postgraduate Certificate | Postgraduate Diploma | Masters |
|---|---|---|
|
Two modules from column 2 (part time only) |
Two additional modules from:
(Choices will be determined by the module timetable and/or the number of participants enrolling.) |
Dissertation |
|
Route 2: Four M level modules negotiated, planned and delivered in partnership with schools / learning coalitions or Local Authority to meet specific development aims and priorities. |
|
|
Route 1 is for participants who enrol on an individual basis. Face to face elements of the programme are most likely to take place at the UEL Stratford campus. Assessments have been designed to allow individuals to focus upon an aspect of their practice / role which is relevant to their context as well as to the specific module. Route 1 is available for part time study only.
Route 2 is for schools / learning coalitions and Local Authorities. Schools / learning coalitions engage in a planning process which aims to support school leaders to raise the level of engagement of their staff in school development and CPD activities to Masters level. Participants have the option of submitting work for Masters level credit, or of engaging at Masters level without submitting work for credit. A framework for planning integral school development and CPD at Masters level offers the opportunity to build upon established school development processes such as planning meetings, peer observation, mentoring and coaching and staff development time as part of then Masters learning experience. Assessment is structured around the desired development outcomes. Route 2 is available for part time study only.
Participants will have the opportunity to engage in face to face seminars, workshops and lectures as well as collaborative activities and discussions in a virtual learning environment.
All M level modules are assessed by the submission of a single portfolio of 5,000 words or equivalent.
Supports development and demonstrates achievement in relation to:
Supports development in relation to your local and national context.
The dissertation provides an opportunity to undertake a research project relevant to educational development in the context of the participant’s role and/or practice.
The integration of theory and practice provides opportunities for participants to personalise their learning and address areas of interest and challenge in the context of their work. The pedagogy of the programme includes a focus upon collaborative learning which supports participants to address current issues and problems through the strength of collective knowledge, experience and expertise.
Teaching is set to become a postgraduate profession. The UK government have set a target in the for all teachers to have a Masters level qualification by 2018. Masters level qualifications are becoming increasingly important to career progression in many countries and is an internationally recognised qualification.
Academic support is provided by module tutors whilst the participants are undertaking each module. The Programme Leader can also offer academic guidance about the programme and progression.
This programme is designed to give you the opportunity to:
It is expected that by the end of the programme participants will have the ability to:
Knowledge
Thinking skills
Subject-Based Practical skills/ skills for life and work (general skills)
All programmes are credit-rated to help you to understand the amount and level of study that is needed.
One credit is equal to 10 hours of directed study time (this includes everything you do e.g. lecture, seminar and private study).
Credits are assigned to one of 5 levels:
The typical duration of this programme is 2 years part-time.
| Autumn term | Spring term | Summer term | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Route 1 part time |
30 credit module |
30 credit module |
30 credit module |
|
30 credit module |
dissertation |
||
|
Route 2 part time |
One 30 credit M level module/ term. To be negotiated with partners as appropriate. |
||
Where a student is eligible for an Masters award then the award classification is determined by calculating the arithmetic mean of all marks and applying the mark obtained as a percentage, with all decimals points rounded up to the nearest whole number, to the following classification
|
70% - 100% |
Distinction |
|
60% - 69% |
Merit |
|
50% - 59% |
Pass |
|
0% - 49% |
Not Passed |
Teaching and learning strategies may include:
Summative assessment
Assessment will vary between modules but will include a mixture of:
All PG Cert and PG Dip modules are assessed by the submission of a single portfolio of 5,000 words.
The dissertation comprises a 1,000 word research proposal and a dissertation of 14,000 words
Formative assessment
There will be opportunities to receive formative assessment throughout the module through:
Before this programme started, the following was checked:
This is done through a process of programme approval which involves consulting academic experts including some subject specialists from other institutions.
The quality of this programme is monitored each year through evaluating:
Drawing on this and other information, programme teams undertake the annual Review and Enhancement Process which is co-ordinated at School level and includes student participation. The process is monitored by the Quality and Standards Committee.
Once every six years an in-depth review of the whole field is undertaken by a panel that includes at least two external subject specialists. The panel considers documents, looks at student work, speaks to current and former participants and speaks to staff before drawing its conclusions. The result is a report highlighting good practice and identifying areas where action is needed.
This programme has a programme committee comprising all relevant teaching staff, student representatives and others who make a contribution towards the effective operation of the programme (e.g. library/technician staff). The committee has responsibilities for the quality of the programme. It provides input into the operation of the Review and Enhancement Process and proposes changes to improve quality. The programme committee plays a critical role in the quality assurance procedures.
The standard of this programme is monitored by at least one external examiner. External examiners have two primary responsibilities:
External examiners fulfil these responsibilities in a variety of ways including:
The following methods for gaining student feedback are used on this programme:
Participants are notified of the action taken through:
The following methods are used for gaining the views of other interested parties:
| Location | Which elements? | Taught by UEL staff | Taught by local staff | Method of Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further information about this programme is available from:
For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description
For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information