|
Final award |
D.ConsOrg (Professional Doctorate) |
|
Intermediate awards available |
N/A |
|
UCAS code |
N/A |
|
Details of professional body accreditation |
N/A |
|
Relevant QAA Benchmark statements |
N/A |
|
Date specification last up-dated |
November 2011 |
The Professional Doctorate in Consultation and the Organisation is designed to provide opportunities for professional development in a consultative approach to organisations informed by psychoanalytic and systemic thinking and to provide the appropriate skills to undertake a piece of original scholarly research which will contribute to the knowledge base in the field.
This is achieved by providing:
Doctoral students will have the opportunity to:
The doctoral programme is a free-standing course that builds on the two-year MA in Consultation and the Organisation: Psychoanalytic Approaches (course D10). Applicants who have not completed D10, but who have equivalent qualifications and/or experience, are welcome to apply. This programme complies with the UEL Professional Doctorate regulations and as such may be subject to revision from time to time.
Students will be joining a well-established training enterprise in Consultation to Organisations at the Tavistock Clinic and will benefit from the established expertise and from the wide range of Professional Practice undertaken at the clinic and the Tavistock Consultancy Service. They will have access to one of the most comprehensive collections of literature on psychoanalysis and human behaviour in the world.
Essential requirements:
All applicants will need to have completed, or will complete by the end of the programme, a minimum of two Group Relations Conferences, at least one of which is residential, totalling a minimum of 10 days experience. This may include conferences offered by the Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust, The Tavistock Institute (The Leicester Conference), the Grubb Institute or comparable institutions overseas (e.g. AK Rice Institute). (Students who have completed the MA in Consultation and the Organisation: Psychoanalytic Approaches will have attended a 5 day residential Group Relations Conference).
Applicants with either prior-certified learning or prior-experiential learning that closely matches the specified learning outcomes of the taught part of the programme may be able to claim exemption via agreed university procedures. No exemption can be claimed against the research part of the programme (apart from the taught course in Research Design, Ethics and Methodology) or in situations where a professional body excludes it.
Where English is not the applicant's first language, a minimum IELTS Academic English, or such qualifications as our University deems comparable, score of 7.0 overall, with a minimum of 6.5 in all components, is required at entry. Such assessment of English language competence must normally have been undertaken no more than two years prior to application, though relevant and more recent study in a United Kingdom Higher Education Institution may be accepted as sufficient proof of ability.
Students will take a minimum of three years and nine months to complete the course and submit the thesis. The course is part time.
After the approved registration of the research proposal the maximum period of registration is 60 months and the minimum period 30 months. This normally takes place towards the end of the second year of the taught programme. The permitted maximum period from first enrolment is 8 years.
Students attend one day per fortnight in the first three years.
The programme has complementary two strands:
The strands are structured into 7 units:

In the first three years of the programme students will learn more about consultation and must undertake a minimum of eight consultancy projects to develop their professional consultancy practice, six of which are written up as Consultancy Reports. Students' performance in seminars and supervision on the course will also form part of their assessment. The projects will need to be chosen to evidence a capacity to work in a variety of consultative situations; reflect work in different sectors (public, commercial, voluntary etc.); and demonstrate a range of interventions, including at least one example of the following:
Other interventions may be included additionally.
The consultancy research is an opportunity to contribute the knowledge base in the field of systems psychodynamics, consultancy and organisations. Research ideas will be developed from a wide range of possibilities and could include:
Students complete an essay (R1) and a research proposal (R2) towards their eventual research project and completion of a 40-60,000 word Thesis.
The teaching methods used are varied and include:
Assessment methods vary across the five programme units.
Consultancy Units
The four consultancy units (C1, C2 C3 and C4) include the assessment of practical performance in seminars and supervision on the course. These performance skills would be evidenced by the student's contribution to the professional practice seminars and individual supervision sessions and assessed on a continuous basis by their tutors and supervisors against the relevant assessment and marking criteria. Tutors and supervisors will provide annual written reports for each student for the first three years of the programme which will form part of the assessment of the Consultancy Units.
Each of the four units additionally includes at least one assessed written submission:
Research Units
Research in Practice R1 - Essay –an essay of up to 4,000 words which critically reflects on the student's professional practice to date, locates their research interests and critically evaluates the literature in a relevant area.
The work undertaken on the professional doctorate will be of immediate value to students' professional practice and development. The regular supervision and discussion of ongoing consultancy work supports reflexive practice and development of advanced professional skills. The choice of research project provides further opportunity for students to develop and apply knowledge, understanding and skills to push the boundaries of not only their own practice but that of the wider professional field of consultation to organisations.
Throughout years 1 and 2 of the programme students will have the opportunity to discuss and develop their ideas for research and formulate a proposal with support from their peers, tutors and individual supervisors.
Registration of the research component can only take place following a recommendation from the relevant School Research Degrees Sub-Committee to the University Research Degrees Committee of the suitability of the candidate to undertake research, of the programme of research, of the supervision arrangements and of the research environment. These approvals require appropriate academic judgement to be brought to bear on the viability of each research proposal.
Candidates for a Professional Doctorate must successfully complete all assessed elements of their programme before award of the degree can be made.
Once the research stage of the programme is reached progression will be formally reviewed annually by a Panel comprised of staff with appropriate academic and professional expertise who are independent of the candidate's supervisory team. The School Research Degrees Sub-Committee and the university Research Degrees Subcommittee monitor the reports from these Panels.
The examination of the research component of the Professional Doctorate has two stages: firstly the submission and preliminary assessment of the research; and secondly its defence by oral examination.
Feedback from the early cohorts of students has been very positive.
“The doctorate certainly does what it says on the box. I feel much more able to take up my role as a consultant and, near the end of completing my research, have been offered several senior positions in the consultancy world. Delighted.” (Member of the first cohort of the professional doctorate 2006)
“Teaching is consistently high quality, the course design is a strength. As an independent practitioner I have been able to think more clearly about my work.” (Feedback from 2009 cohort)
The Tavistock is currently engaging in discussions with other organisations who offer related trainings in consultation and organisational development with the intention that a professional body be established to register and accredit those who have qualified from recognised training courses in consulting to organisation. Currently no such professional body exists.
Possession of the professional doctorate would be an advantage in applying for high-level posts with a consultation brief, either nationally or internationally. Additionally the experience of having undertaken projects evaluating consultancy practice would be highly valued. Graduates might be expected to contribute to training others in consultancy skills. Similarly this doctorate would also be advantageous in applying for or being promoted to high-level managerial positions, where a capacity to understand complexity of organisational issues, together with skills in enabling development and change in an organisation would be highly relevant.
Students are supported by their personal tutor, thesis and professional practice supervisors, work discussion and thesis seminar leaders. There is a range of additional support services organised by the Tavistock and UEL which students are able to access.
Small groups, together with the emphasis on review and reflection that is a central tenet of the programme provide opportunity for students to work closely together in a supportive environment within which lasting professional relationships may be forged.
The Graduate School is responsible for providing a focus to the support of our postgraduate research students and for our institution's research and scholarly strategy.
Professional Doctorate students will have at least two and not normally more than three supervisors, who together demonstrate an appropriate range of academic and professional experience. One supervisor shall be the Director of Studies with responsibility to supervise the candidate on a regular and frequent basis.
The Tavistock is an internationally renowned centre of excellence for psychoanalytic studies, research, and clinical work. There are also opportunities to hear speakers eminent in the field and to meet colleagues from a diversity of backgrounds who have a common interest in psychoanalytical and systemic perspectives on understanding organisations and consultation.
The interactive approach of the programme provides added value for organisations, as some of the projects may be developed within the context of the student's own organisation. This consultative approach is thus available within the organisation through the student's work on the programme. Organisations may thus be willing to fund students to undertake the programme. The interactive approach is also of value to self-employed students, who will acquire a peer group and supervision opportunities for some of their work.
What is this programme designed to achieve?
This programme is designed to give you the opportunity to:
A candidate who is awarded a Professional Doctorate will be expected to have achieved the following learning outcomes:
Knowledge
Thinking skills
Subject-Based Practical skills
Skills for life and work (general skills)
Introduction
All programmes are credit-rated to help you to understand the amount and level of study that is needed.
One credit is equal to 10 hours of directed study time (this includes everything you do e.g. lecture, seminar and private study).
Credits are assigned to one of 5 levels:
The overall credit rating for the Professional Doctorate in Consultation and the Organisation programme is 580.
The normal minimum and maximum periods of registration for a Professional Doctorate at The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust are as follows:
| Minimum | Maximum | |
| Part-time | 30 months | 60 months |
The teaching year begins in October and ends in July. The overall academic requirement is a weekly commitment of two full days.
In years 1 to 3 students are expected to attend for teaching on a fortnightly basis for a full day and will be expected to spend at least three days each fortnight in independent study. Additional individual supervision on professional practice or research or tutorials may be arranged outside of this time.
What you will study when
|
Year |
Terms |
Level |
UEL Module |
Module Title |
Credit |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
1-3 |
D |
*** tbc |
Consultancy 1 |
60 |
Core |
|
2 |
1-3 |
D |
*** tbc |
Consultancy 2 |
60 |
Core |
|
1 |
1-3 |
D |
*** tbc |
Research in Practice 1 |
40 |
Core |
|
2 |
1-3 |
D |
***tbc |
Research in Practice 2 |
40 |
Core |
|
3 |
1-3 |
D |
*** tbc |
Consultancy 3 |
60 |
Core |
|
3 |
1-3 |
D |
***tbc |
Consultancy 4 |
20 |
Core |
|
3+ |
|
D |
*** tbc |
Thesis |
300 |
Core |
In order to gain the Professional Doctorate Award, you will need to obtain 580 credits at D level.
Knowledge is developed through
Thinking skills are developed through
Practical skills are developed through
Skills for life and work (general skills) are developed through
There are two main assessment methods used on the programme:
Knowledge is assessed by
Thinking skills are assessed by
Practical skills are assessed by
Skills for life and work (general skills) are assessed by
Before this programme started
Before this programme started, the following was checked:
This is done through a process of programme approval which involves consulting academic experts including some subject specialists from other institutions.
The quality of this programme is monitored each year through evaluating:
Drawing on this and other information, programme teams undertake the annual Review and Enhancement Process which is co-ordinated at School level and includes student participation. The process is monitored by the Quality and Standards Committee.
Once every six years an in-depth review of the whole field is undertaken by a panel that includes at least two external subject specialists. The panel considers documents, looks at student work, speaks to current and former students and speaks to staff before drawing its conclusions. The result is a report highlighting good practice and identifying areas where action is needed.
The role of the programme committee
This programme has a programme committee comprising all relevant teaching staff, student representatives and others who make a contribution towards the effective operation of the programme (e.g. library/technician staff). The committee has responsibilities for the quality of the programme. It provides input into the operation of the Review and Enhancement Process and proposes changes to improve quality. The programme committee plays a critical role in the quality assurance procedures.
The standard of this programme is monitored by at least one external examiner. External examiners have two primary responsibilities:
External examiners fulfil these responsibilities in a variety of ways including:
The following methods for gaining student feedback are used on this programme:
Students are notified of the action taken through:
The following methods are used for gaining the views of other interested parties:
Further information about this programme is available from:
For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description
For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information