|
Final award |
D. App. Ed. Ch. Psy |
|
Intermediate awards available |
N/A |
|
UCAS code |
N/A |
|
Details of professional body accreditation |
N/A |
|
Relevant QAA Benchmark statements |
|
|
Date specification last up-dated |
July 2009 |
The principal aim of the Professional Doctorate programme is to make a significant contribution to the advanced professional and academic development of educational psychologists by offering a programme of study which will enable them (as students) to:
1. engage at an advanced level with a wide range of issues of concern to professionals in educational psychology and allied professions;
2. develop appropriate research skills for researching professional concerns;
3. carry out independent research which will represent a contribution to professional knowledge or practice.
These objectives will be met through academic support, production of assignments, research training and opportunities to undertake research. A paramount aim is to integrate theory and practice in all aspects of the programme. Successful completion of (a) a portfolio and (b) a research thesis leads to the award of the degree of Professional Doctorate Applied Educational and Child Psychology.
The distinctive characteristics of the Programme at UEL
Eligibility
Candidates who are able to demonstrate that they have already successfully completed a recognised postgraduate professional training in educational psychology and are currently practising in this capacity are eligible to apply for the programme. A command of the English language is also required.
Applications
All candidates will complete and submit the standard university postgraduate application form which includes a requirement for two referees. Candidates will be asked to prepare a supporting paper of 1000-1500 words giving their reasons for wanting to join the programme, citing relevant evidence that they believe supports their ability to study at doctorate level and indicating the level of support available from their employing organisations.
Scrutiny of Applications
The following criteria will be used to evaluate applications for shortlisting for interview and as part of the process of deciding whether a place will be offered:
Interviewing and selection
Following scrutiny of application forms short listed applicants will be invited for an interview. This is intended to be an opportunity for candidates to learn more about the programme as well as a means of selection. At the interview, candidates will have the opportunity to discuss their ideas and plans in more detail.
At least two members of academic staff will review each application before a decision is made.
Applicants with either prior-certified learning or prior-experiential learning that closely matches the specified learning outcomes of the taught part of the programme may be able to claim exemption via agreed university procedures. No exemption can be claimed against the research part of the programme or in situations where a professional body excludes it.
In the case of applicants whose first language is not English, then IELTS 8.0 points (or equivalent) is required with a minimum of 6.5 points being achieved at each language level. International qualifications will be checked for appropriate matriculation to UK Higher Education postgraduate programmes
Introduction
The programme is structured in that students are required to attend nine study days per year, and a research weekend. These cover a research methods programme, tutorials, seminars, workshops and student research study groups. Students are also required to attend tutorials with their supervisory team on a regular basis. The programme academic requirements include a Portfolio and Research Thesis.
Professional doctorate programmes can be either ‘taught’ or ‘research’ in their emphasis (that is, when measured by student effort). Both have equal status and share the same learning outcomes. You should check with the relevant school to find out where the emphasis is for this particular programme.
Students are required to attend 9 UEL based Study Days per year, one annual weekend research conference focussing on research methodology and UEL for regular, individual tutorials. Doctorate work (data collection, researching, reading etc) is undertaken in the field, in the workplace and at UEL. Telephone and e-mail tutor contact will also be available.
A : THE PORTFOLIO
Students are required to submit four themed assignments which make up a Portfolio, and a research thesis.
Theme 1: REFLECTIVE LEARNING
A reflective learning log
Theme II and III: CURRENT AND RECENT PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE/EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY TOPIC
An account of a current professional piece of work: one case in depth or up to three individual cases, or specialist project or management activity demonstrating evidence of the application of psychology. This assignment should be written in the format of a journal article, on a topic in Educational Psychology relevant to the whole doctorate theme selected by the student.
THEME IV: RESEARCH
B : THE RESEARCH THESIS
A Thesis based upon a research project.
This professional doctorate programme reflects professional practice as well as research. Some of the assignments can be, and are, conducted in the workplace. As and when the need for work based mentors arises, these will be either a student’s line manager and/or a colleague with expertise in the given topic area.
Registration of the research component can only take place following a recommendation from the relevant School Research Degrees Sub-Committee to the university PGR Review Sub-Committee of the suitability of the candidate to undertake research, of the programme of research, of the supervision arrangements and of the research environment. These approvals require appropriate academic judgement to be brought to bear on the viability of each research proposal.
Candidates for a Professional Doctorate must, prior to the submission of the research derived assessment, successfully complete all assessed elements from the taught part of the programme.
Once the research stage of the programme is reached progression will be formally reviewed annually by a Panel comprised of staff with appropriate academic and professional expertise who are independent of the candidate’s supervisory team. The School’s Research Degrees Sub-Committee and the PGR Review Sub-Committee monitor the reports from these Panels.
The examination of the research component of the Professional Doctorate has two stages: firstly the submission and preliminary assessment of the research; and secondly its defence by oral examination.
The thesis should:
The thesis must be between 42,000 and 45,000 words in length.
Study Day attendance and studies carried out on the programme should enable students to meet Continuing Professional Development (CPD) requirements for the Health Professions Council.
Students are already working and are on a career path; a number of students have already obtained promotion to senior posts. Successful completion of the doctorate programme may in some instances lead to career advancement. The selection of an underlying topic area may also lead students to be regarded as specialists in a specific area.
We offer:
Research methods training is offered via:
The Graduate School is responsible for providing a focus to the support of our postgraduate research students and for our institution’s research and scholarly strategy.
Professional Doctorate students will have at least two and not normally more than three supervisors, who together demonstrate an appropriate range of academic and professional experience. One supervisor shall be the Director of Studies with responsibility to supervise the candidate on a regular and frequent basis.
Distinctive characteristics of the programme include the opportunity to meet, discuss and study with other students from all over the UK and beyond which is welcomed and valued by all. Also, students and graduates report that opportunities to undertake scholarship and enquiry at an advanced level enhances them as practitioners as well as researchers. Students appreciate negotiated learning opportunities that encourage (a) maximisation of their experience and skills, (b) fostering of new competences, and (c) maximum student choice of study topics. Completed assignments may lead to publication in peer reviewed and other journals.
This programme is designed to give you the opportunity to:
A candidate who is awarded a Professional Doctorate will be expected to have achieved the following learning outcomes:
Created and interpreted new knowledge, through original research, or other advanced scholarship, of a quality to satisfy peer review, which extends the forefront of the discipline and merits publication;
Systematically acquired an understanding of a substantial body of knowledge which is at the forefront of an academic discipline or area of professional practice;
The general ability to conceptualise, design and implement a project for the generation of new knowledge, application or understanding at the forefront of the discipline and to adjust the project design in the light of unforeseen problems;
A detailed understanding of applicable techniques for research and advanced academic enquiry;
Ability to make informed judgements on complex issues in specialist fields, often in the absence of complete data, and be able to communicate their ideas and conclusions clearly and effectively to specialist and non-specialist audiences:
Ability to continue to undertake pure and/or applied research and development at an advanced level, contributing substantially to the development of new techniques, ideas or approaches;
The qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment requiring the exercise of personal responsibility and largely autonomous initiative in complex and unpredictable situations, in professional or equivalent environments.
Knowledge
Thinking skills
Subject-Based Practical skills
Skills for life and work (general skills)
Introduction
All programmes are credit-rated to help you to understand the amount and level of study that is needed.
One credit is equal to 10 hours of directed study time (this includes everything you do e.g. lecture, seminar and private study).
Credits are assigned to one of 5 levels:
0 equivalent in standard to GCE 'A' level and is intended to prepare students for year one of an undergraduate degree programme
1 equivalent in standard to the first year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
2 equivalent in standard to the second year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
3 equivalent in standard to the third year of a full-time undergraduate degree programme
M equivalent in standard to a Masters degree
Professional Doctorate programmes are not credit rated although the taught elements within them may be.
The normal minimum and maximum periods of registration for a Professional Doctorate are as follows:
Minimum Maximum
Part-time 45 months 60 months
There are 9 study days at the university and a 2 day annual conference each year.
Students will usually complete their Portfolio during years 1 or 2, and then undertake their research activities. Study Days include teaching and learning related to the themed assignments which make up the Portfolio, presentations by students and taught research skills.
In order to achieve the doctoral award, students must complete and pass all their Portfolio assignments (Themes 1, 2/3, and 4), their research proposal and achieve ethical approval for their research project. They must also submit and successfully defend their thesis in an oral examination (a viva voce).
Knowledge is developed through
Thinking skills are developed through
Practical skills are developed through
Skills for life and work (general skills) are developed through
The Porfolio includes 4 written assignments, each of which will be assessed. These are (a) a reflective log, (b) an assignment on an educational psychology topic written in the style of a journal article, (c) a research essay, and (d) a research proposal. Each of these assignments will be assessed, and are required to receive a PASS grade. A research thesis is also required.
Before this programme started, the following was checked:
This is done through a process of programme approval which involves consulting academic experts including some subject specialists from other institutions.
The quality of this programme is monitored each year through evaluating:
Drawing on this and other information, programme teams undertake the annual Review and Enhancement Process which is co-ordinated at School level and includes student participation. The process is monitored by the Quality and Standards Committee.
Once every six years an in-depth review of the whole field is undertaken by a panel that includes at least two external subject specialists. The panel considers documents, looks at student work, speaks to current and former students and speaks to staff before drawing its conclusions. The result is a report highlighting good practice and identifying areas where action is needed.
This programme has a programme committee comprising all relevant teaching staff, student representatives and others who make a contribution towards the effective operation of the programme (e.g. library/technician staff). The committee has responsibilities for the quality of the programme. It provides input into the operation of the Review and Enhancement Process and proposes changes to improve quality. The programme committee plays a critical role in the quality assurance procedures.
The standard of this programme is monitored by at least one external examiner. External examiners have two primary responsibilities:
External examiners fulfil these responsibilities in a variety of ways including:
The following methods for gaining student feedback are used on this programme:
Students are notified of the action taken through:
The following methods are used for gaining the views of other interested parties:
| Location | Which elements? | Taught by UEL staff | Taught by local staff | Method of Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Further information about this programme is available from:
For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description
For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information