Position: Senior Lecturer
Location: EB.1.30
Telephone: 0208 223 2935
Email: d.ellis@uel.ac.uk
Contact address:
School of Law and Social Sciences (LSS)
University of East London
Docklands Campus
University Way
London E16 2RD
I presently have a contract with Sage Publications to write a book entitled ‘The Social Psychology of Emotion’. The book includes three major sections: the history and philosophies of emotion; discipline specific views of emotion (such as, biological, psychological, social, psychoanalytic and post-structuralist); and contemporary psychosocial research involving emotion. I have been working with Dr Dave Harper and Dr Ian Tucker (both in UEL’s School of Psychology) on a project concerned with everyday experiences of living in a surveillance society. We were awarded a small grant to recruit research assistants who conducted semi-structured interviews with Londoners about their views of living in a so called ‘surveillance society’. A number of papers are presently in submission and a further grant application is being sought. My particular analytic interests here are concerns with (impersonal) trust and suspicion; and thinking about the surveillance society in terms of ‘affective atmospheres’. I have recently been doing some research on conspiracy theory website forums. I am interested in how individuals, who are usually marginalised because of their unusual beliefs, interact in online spaces. This has led to a project which looks at the rhetoric and discourse that adherents of conspiratorial beliefs utilise and the formation of online identities. I am also analysing the virtual environment of a prominent conspiracy theory website in relation to the forms of identity constructions that it influences.
I would be interested in supervising PhD projects or conducting collaborative research with researchers/students who propose to draw on psychosocial/critical social-psychology related theory to look at the following areas:
Employment
Education
I am the module leader for the following modules:
I am a seminar tutor for the following modules:
PUBLICATIONS
Evidence generated within the emotional disclosure paradigm (EDP) suggests that talking or writing about emotional experiences produces health benefits, but recent meta-analyses have questioned its efficacy. Studies within the EDP typically rely upon a unidimensional and relatively unsophisticated notion of emotional inhibition, and tend to use quantitative forms of content analysis to identify associations between percentages of word types and positive or negative health outcomes. In this article, we use a case study to show how a qualitative discourse analysis has the potential to identify more of the complexity linking the disclosure practices and styles that may be associated with emotional inhibition. This may illuminate the apparent lack of evidence for efficacy of the EDP by enabling more comprehensive theorisations of the variations within it.
New media technologies are becoming an increasingly prominent constituent of everyday living, with their proliferation presenting new challenges to key aspects of the self, namely agency and identity. The potential recalibration of these notions comes about through new forms of agency being produced when information technologies play an increasingly powerful role in our lives. In this context agency is not something that can be reified and easily measured, or understood as solely intentional human action. Instead, agency is understood as something that comes to be as practices of life making. We take up these ideas in relation to people’s experiences with information technologies. Through semi-structured interviews with members of the public from London and the South East of the UK, we analyse how information technologies potentially recalibrate people’s subjectivity through informational agency. Participants’ engagements with information technologies are more nuanced and complex than a ‘either good or bad’ distinction. This is is one of the analytic foci of the paper, as information technologies, even when viewed with suspicion or as creating concern, are often willfully utilised due to the perceived benefits they can bring. We focus on the potential technologisation of identity and subjectivity through arguing that new forms of digitally mediated selves are produced when daily lives come to be defined more by information than by the flesh and blood of our bodies. We conclude by drawing attention to challenges facing our experiences, and understandings of, subjectivity brought about by the relentless informationalisation of life.
Distinctions and relationships between interpersonal trust and impersonal trust are popularly theorised as the difference between trust and confidence. In this sense we have trust in persons but have confidence in abstract systems such as the government. Hence, interpersonal trust is often portrayed as being more affect laden than impersonal trust. This paper argues against these positions by looking at the ways impersonal (dis)trust in the case of institutionalised Islamophobia in the British context, may lead to forms of interpersonal distrust and ontological insecurity through the affective embodiment of political suspicion.
It has long been recognised that discretion is vital to good police work. However, in Britain (and many other countries), practices of discretion in the stop and search context have come under much scrutiny as it has widely been linked to racist practices, i.e. a disproportionate amount of Black and minority ethnic individuals are stopped and searched compared to White people. In a bid to counteract the discretionary practices that are seen to be linked to racist stops and searches, police officers are required (in stops and searches under section 1 of the PACE code A) to have 'reasonable grounds for suspicion'. This article evaluates what has been claimed as the tension between the required reasonable grounds for suspicion and the need to draw on generalisations (police discretion) for effective policing.
The emotional disclosure paradigm (EDP) associates better health with repeated disclosure of emotional experiences. However, disclosure does not bring health benefits for all, and neither does the EDP adequately specify embodied mechanisms or neural pathways whereby benefits might be produced. This paper addresses these issues by offering more sophisticated notions of emotional inhibition and cognitive reappraisal. It then outlines aspects of the somatic marker hypothesis which supports a more comprehensive conceptualization of the processes that may enable both the positive and negative health effects of disclosure.
Professional Membership
Chartered Member of the British Psychological Society
Member of the Psychosocial Network
For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description
For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information