Position: Academic Director and Professor of Management
Location: BS.3.34
Telephone: 0208 223 2202
Email: K.Chaharbaghi@uel.ac.uk
Contact address:
UEL Royal Docks Business School
University of East London
Docklands Campus
4-6 University Way
London E16 2RD
Leads Research and Knowledge Exchange and is the Professor of Management at the Business School. Current research interests include the economy, sociology and ecology of knowledge and innovation, and politics of meaning. These research themes critically explore: ways in which discourse promotes and embodies particular kind of values and interests, and actively constructs at the same time as it reflects reality in social organisation; the contestability of social concepts and constructs with no fixed meaning; the usage of contested concepts and constructs in fostering and extending particular values, agendas and practices; ways in which a dominant discourse governs truth as a regime and shapes the conditions for “knowing” within a given context; and the dynamics and struggle of competing discourses in winning legitimacy.
Professor Chaharbaghi has undertaken work for organisations such as Hewlett-Packard, Rolls Royce, GEC-Althom, Ford and Van Leer, and has served as the Executive Board Member of the Management Division of IEE and Association for Global Business. He has over 100 publications which have appeared in journals such as Long Range Planning, Journal of General Management, British Journal of Management and Management Decision.
Research and Knowledge Exchange
The economy, sociology and ecology of knowledge and innovation, and politics of meaning.
Research Methods and Innovation
K. Chaharbaghi and J. Barry (2010) Paradoxing Relevance in the Research Quality Debate. Philosophy of Management Journal, forthcoming.
K. Chaharbaghi (2010) The audit dilemma in public services. International Journal of Critical Accounting, forthcoming.
Whilst in some way, audits can be seen as positive in terms of bringing about external accountability and regulation of high standards, the involvement of an approach in maintaining such standards by attaching a heavy weight to ‘quality’ control considerations is questionable. This is because such an approach shifts the focus from performance, which is about results, to conformance which emphasises norm-following behaviour. In other words, it shifts focus from what professionals can do in delivering public services to what they cannot do. This can be demonstrated using the arguments put forward in a recent public debate on the audit culture which enjoyed the participation of a significant number of academic professionals who have experienced it and question its legitimacy and those in the position of authority who promote and reinforce it. The evidence from this debate suggests that whilst audits have their origin in the Utopian craving for imagined ideal public services, when they crystallise into a culture, involving sets of largely unconscious assumptions, they can be distorted to such an extent that they conceal more than they reveal with the result that the actual policy pursued is the exact opposite of the professed ideal.
For a general description of these pages and an explanation of how they should work with screenreading equipment please follow this link: Link to general description
For further information on this web site’s accessibility features please follow this link: Link to accessibility information